Post-accident photos of RV/TBM Avenger Oshkosh taxi collision

Morgans wrote:
In case you missed it, I posted them over in

alt.binaries.pictures.aviation under the subject of "OSH TBM accident".


And thanks for posting them, and defeating some of the censorship.
I did see them, and also posted the location earlier in this thread.


They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.


Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

"Jerry Springer" wrote in

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

Just to be sure I didn't miss them, what are they named in the subject box?

I'm pretty sure that my server removed them.
--
Jim in NC

In article , "Morgans"
wrote:


Just to be sure I didn't miss them, what are they named in the subject box?

I'm pretty sure that my server removed them.

"TBM" is in the subject line and reference to OSH.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

Morgans wrote:
"Jerry Springer" wrote in


Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.


Just to be sure I didn't miss them, what are they named in the subject box?

I'm pretty sure that my server removed them.

The easiest wasy to find them is to look for the sender "skywise"
and then "OSH TBM Accident" they are up this morning. I say these are
very educational photos.

try this link to see them, not sure how long it well be avialable.


http://flickr.com/photos/bowen/tags/...h2006accident/

Could be that some servers don't have the room to keep them up for long.

Jerry

("Morgans" wrote)
I'm pretty sure that my server removed them.


I'm sending you the pics.


Montblack

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:
Morgans wrote:
They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.
Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

The news servers I run don't carry alt.binaries at all, because the
terabytes of data involved are too expensive for the non-profits I do it
for.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
It might not be practical, it might not be a good idea, but it could work.
Sort of like Windows.
-- berry

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.


There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

The news servers I run don't carry alt.binaries at all, because the
terabytes of data involved are too expensive for the non-profits I do it
for.

No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:
Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:
Morgans wrote:
They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.

If "everyone" understands that, what possible reason could you have for
telling Morgans that they're still on your server when you don't even tell
him which server you're talking about? How does that help him? And why
would you refer to your server as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
site"?


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Ok I'll "just hit delete". You can be "Delete".
- Ron Ritzman, talking to a spammer

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Paul Tomblin wrote:

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.


No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.


If "everyone" understands that, what possible reason could you have for
telling Morgans that they're still on your server when you don't even tell
him which server you're talking about? How does that help him? And why
would you refer to your server as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
site"?


Just to make you feel like a big shot and come on here and tell us
something that everyone that has been on the internet for over a day and
uses usenet already understands, Morgan had already mentioned that
they were not on his server or he might have missed the title to them.

On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 21:29:33 GMT, Jerry springer
wrote:

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Paul Tomblin wrote:

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.


No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.


If "everyone" understands that, what possible reason could you have for
telling Morgans that they're still on your server when you don't even tell
him which server you're talking about? How does that help him? And why
would you refer to your server as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
site"?


Just to make you feel like a big shot and come on here and tell us
something that everyone that has been on the internet for over a day and
uses usenet already understands, Morgan had already mentioned that
they were not on his server or he might have missed the title to them.

The internet has nothing to do with usenet. The internet uses the
HTTP protocol. Usenet uses the NNTP protocol. Both exist without the
need for the other. NNTP is actually older than "the internet."

HTH.
z