![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Was I correct in maintaining 2800 before the IAF or is the
controller allowed to clear me below a minimum dictated by an approach chart? I often fly this same approach. On occasion, a controller will give me a lower altitude than published, but when I say, "Skyhawk 1234X requests 2800 to comply with the procedure", they always give it to me. Your controller made a mistake and you should have corrected it. His instruction to descend and maintain 2,100 was an order, and technically you were wrong to ignore it. BTW, MVA in that area is probably 2,000 feet, so you were safe at 2,100, but not in compliance with the procedure. Controllers make mistakes like this *all the time*, and you should be spring-loaded to deal with it in a polite way. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 07:31 PM |
| Contact approach question | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 114 | January 31st 05 07:40 PM |
| Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 05:19 AM |
| Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | April 16th 04 01:41 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |