A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OLV GPS 36 approach question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old August 10th 06, 04:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default OLV GPS 36 approach question

wrote:
Looking at the FAA version of the approach plate, profile section, it
has
2800 to DOCAP, then descend to 2100 at CICAL for the final approach
into
OLV.

The 2,800 ft segment you see is the Hold-in-Lieu. A HIL is part of the
initial segment, which doesn't begin until the IAF. From your
direction of flight, the HIL wasn't required for you, so its altitude
didn't apply.

Regardless, ATC has a right to assign you an altitude to maintain until
you arrive at a certain fix; only AFTER you arrive there do published
altitudes apply. Until then, you're relying on their MVA to keep you
safe.


ATC has an obligation to assign an offroute altitude. If they don't
then the pilot has a regulatory obligation to challenge the lack of an
altitude assignment (one of the many changes provided by TWA 514
crashing into Mt. Weather on Dec 1, 1974.)

In this instance it would have been reasonable for the pilot to
challenge the 2,100-foot assignment since 2,800 is shown at DOCAP.

When this change to the AIM and ATC Order was discussed, I think
everyone envisioned 2,800 being assigned for a direct-to DOCAP. But,
once the real-world takes over...

The controllers really have to know the IAP to assign any altitude less
than that shown in the profile at the IF. I am not sure that is the
conservative way to go, but it is certainly legal so long as there isn't
a step-down in the intermediate somewhere that is missed.


If they had cleared you to ECILE, and told you to maintain 2,100, then
there would have been a problem. You're fine until you get to ECILE,
but the moment you pass that fix, you're in violation of 91.177.

Same thing if you had come from the north direction to DOCAP. You'd be
fine at 2,100 until the fix, but the HIL is required from this
direction and you'd be in violation of 91.177 once you started the hold
entry.


Sam: The fix DOCAP is labeld IF/IAF. Does the segment from DOCAP to
CICAL use initial or intermediate ROC ?

That is the intermediate segment with 500-foot ROC requirements. But,
at a location like this, airspace and descent gradient requirements are
limiting, not ROC. There is probably at least 1,200 feet or more, of
ROC in this particular intermediate segment. The MVA overlying this
intermediate segment is 2,000 feet.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 07:31 PM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 07:40 PM
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 8 May 6th 04 05:19 AM
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 36 April 16th 04 01:41 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 04:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.