![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:32:31 -0500, James Robinson
wrote in : (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote: James Robinson writes: TCAS only works with both transponders working. One was not working. Are you sure? Even a TCAS-II system installed on a machine with an inoperative transponder should still provide traffic alerting, no? Not as I understand it. Here are some quotes from an ARINC description of TCAS-II: "A Mode S transponder is required to be installed and operational for TCAS II to be operational. If the Mode S transponder fails, the TCAS Performance Monitor will detect this failure and automatically place TCAS into Standby." The Mode S requirement is suspect, as I have had jet aircraft indicate that they could see me on their TCAS units while the transponder installed in the aircraft I was operating was not even squawking Mode C, but it was squawking. "TCAS does not alter or diminish the pilot’s basic authority and responsibility to ensure safe flight. Because TCAS does not respond to aircraft that are not transponder-equipped or aircraft with a transponder failure, TCAS alone does not ensure safe separation in every case." That statement does not support your assertion, that both aircraft must have transponders operating for TCAS to provide avoidance information. I would guess, that if the transponder in a TCAS equipped aircraft were turned off, the TCAS unit in that aircraft would still provide information about other transponder equipped (and squawking) aircraft in the area, but that wouldn't do those aircraft with operational transponders any good unless the pilot receiving the TCAS information took evasive action. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Larry Dighera wrote:
James Robinson wrote: (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote: James Robinson writes: TCAS only works with both transponders working. One was not working. Are you sure? Even a TCAS-II system installed on a machine with an inoperative transponder should still provide traffic alerting, no? Not as I understand it. Here are some quotes from an ARINC description of TCAS-II: "A Mode S transponder is required to be installed and operational for TCAS II to be operational. If the Mode S transponder fails, the TCAS Performance Monitor will detect this failure and automatically place TCAS into Standby." The Mode S requirement is suspect, as I have had jet aircraft indicate that they could see me on their TCAS units while the transponder installed in the aircraft I was operating was not even squawking Mode C, but it was squawking. I think you are reading that incorrectly. The full functionality of TCAS-II requires that both aircraft have Mode S transponders, since the RA is worked out using the Mode S data channel. TCAS will "see" other aircraft that are using mode C transponders, but with reduced functionality if "Alt" isn't selected. (TA instead of RA, for example) What the quoted paragraph is saying is that if the transponder on your TCAS-II equipped aircraft is detected as having failed, and that can include one of the two antennas, then the system will automatically drop into standby, and will therefore not be able to either squawk or transmit the necessary interrogations for system functionality. "TCAS does not alter or diminish the pilot’s basic authority and responsibility to ensure safe flight. Because TCAS does not respond to aircraft that are not transponder-equipped or aircraft with a transponder failure, TCAS alone does not ensure safe separation in every case." That statement does not support your assertion, that both aircraft must have transponders operating for TCAS to provide avoidance information. I would guess, that if the transponder in a TCAS equipped aircraft were turned off, the TCAS unit in that aircraft would still provide information about other transponder equipped (and squawking) aircraft in the area, but that wouldn't do those aircraft with operational transponders any good unless the pilot receiving the TCAS information took evasive action. You have to take the two paragraphs together. As I understand it, "standby" means that the transponders will not be squawking. That also means that the interrogations necessary for the functionality of the system won't transmit either. The system does not seem to have a passive mode that simply listens. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
James Robinson wrote in message ...
Larry Dighera wrote: James Robinson wrote: (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote: James Robinson writes: TCAS only works with both transponders working. One was not working. Are you sure? Even a TCAS-II system installed on a machine with an inoperative transponder should still provide traffic alerting, no? Not as I understand it. Here are some quotes from an ARINC description of TCAS-II: "A Mode S transponder is required to be installed and operational for TCAS II to be operational. If the Mode S transponder fails, the TCAS Performance Monitor will detect this failure and automatically place TCAS into Standby." The Mode S requirement is suspect, as I have had jet aircraft indicate that they could see me on their TCAS units while the transponder installed in the aircraft I was operating was not even squawking Mode C, but it was squawking. I think you are reading that incorrectly. The full functionality of TCAS-II requires that both aircraft have Mode S transponders, since the RA is worked out using the Mode S data channel. TCAS will "see" other aircraft that are using mode C transponders, but with reduced functionality if "Alt" isn't selected. (TA instead of RA, for example) What the quoted paragraph is saying is that if the transponder on your TCAS-II equipped aircraft is detected as having failed, and that can include one of the two antennas, then the system will automatically drop into standby, and will therefore not be able to either squawk or transmit the necessary interrogations for system functionality. "TCAS does not alter or diminish the pilot’s basic authority and responsibility to ensure safe flight. Because TCAS does not respond to aircraft that are not transponder-equipped or aircraft with a transponder failure, TCAS alone does not ensure safe separation in every case." That statement does not support your assertion, that both aircraft must have transponders operating for TCAS to provide avoidance information. I would guess, that if the transponder in a TCAS equipped aircraft were turned off, the TCAS unit in that aircraft would still provide information about other transponder equipped (and squawking) aircraft in the area, but that wouldn't do those aircraft with operational transponders any good unless the pilot receiving the TCAS information took evasive action. You have to take the two paragraphs together. As I understand it, "standby" means that the transponders will not be squawking. That also means that the interrogations necessary for the functionality of the system won't transmit either. The system does not seem to have a passive mode that simply listens. That's too bad...sounds like a G1000 that reboots with one bad input. - Rick |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| jet vs jet crash in brazil - 155 likely dead | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | October 11th 06 09:17 PM |
| VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 7th 06 12:13 AM |
| Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 10:00 PM |
| Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 05:40 AM |
| Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 06:58 PM |