![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: Why is flying a multiengine aircraft a separate certification from the basic license (if I understand correctly)? What is so different about having more than one engine that justifies a separate certification? Apart from a few procedures for the failure of an engine, isn't everything else pretty much the same? Does this mean that it is not possible to study for an initial license in a twin-engine plane? Perhaps it's because if you screw the pooch on those "few procedures for the failure of an engine" you will be dead. The only thing that would keep you from getting your initial certificate in a multi would be money. (insurance and the nerve of your CFI may factor into this also) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| Home Built Aircraft - Alternative Engines - Geo/Suzuki | OtisWinslow | Home Built | 1 | October 12th 05 03:55 PM |
| Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 11:14 PM |
| P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 02:09 AM |
| U.S. Air Force Moves Ahead With Studies On Air-Breathing Engines | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 29th 03 04:31 AM |