CNN crash video as capture by USCG

wrote in message
ps.com...
Peter R. wrote:

I discounted those reports the moment I heard them, since loss of control

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
could easily be mistaken for aerobatics to the untrained eye.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


What in your opinion is the average human IQ? 30?


What does IQ matter to a matter of naiveté?

Matt Barrow wrote:

What does IQ matter to a matter of naiveté?


It's imho the only thing that matters. The reasoning of an event/action
is fundamentally reliant on whether a person has
subnormal/normal/above-normal IQ.

If the hordes of acrobatics videos I've seen are anything to go by, not
one maneuver has appeared comparable to the equally large number of
crash videos seen. That acrobatic maneuvers are controlled is easy
enough for anyone normal to tell. And in the event in question here, it
wasn't as if an F-16 (where one might not have known for sure whether
it was out of control) streaked across the sky and crashed but a small
aircraft!

Ramapriya

wrote in message
oups.com...
Matt Barrow wrote:

What does IQ matter to a matter of naiveté?


It's imho the only thing that matters. The reasoning of an event/action
is fundamentally reliant on whether a person has
subnormal/normal/above-normal IQ.

_Reasoning_ has little to do with IQ. _Analysis_ has everything to do with
IQ.

[irrelevant stuff snipped]

Matt Barrow writes:

_Reasoning_ has little to do with IQ. _Analysis_ has everything to do with
IQ.

Both are strongly influenced by IQ. However, acquired knowledge is
much less correlated with intelligence. Thus it is possible to be
naïve and smart, or sophisticated but not very bright.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.