A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FLARM Statistics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old October 14th 06, 12:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Guy Acheson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default A different kind of FLARM?

Good to hear from you, Bumper.
The main problem I observe with these discussions about
alternatives to transponders and that 'something better
is out there' is that it is used as an excuse by so
many people for not installing a transponder now.
'Why buy something that will be obsolete very soon?'

We live, fly, and die in the here and now. Virtually
every argument about the uselessness of transponders
has not panned out in my experience. Even the argument
that TCAS will not be effective in the hinterland because
my transponder is not being 'pinged' by ATC radar has
not been true. No matter where I fly in the great
basin, the Whites to Ely, my transponder is blinking,
blinking, blinking.
I really think the soaring community and the SSA have
been dodging their responsibility to the greater aviation
community by not getting on board with transponders.
Soaring has changed significantly over the last twenty
years. We are flying farther, higher, and faster than
every before. We cover more ground and use higher
altitudes than I ever did flying a Cessna. We make
this big issue about requiring ELTs in planes for competition.
In my opinion that money and energy would have been
much better spent on transponders.
As long as I am pontificating, my other big issue is
that I think every glider and towplane should have
a radio. What other single action or piece of equipment
would improve safety during the two critical phases
of glider flight, launch and landing? So many of the
incidents and accidents associated with open spoilers
or unlatched canopies probably would have had better
outcomes if we could talk to each other. What a concept
that the tow pilot could simply tell the glider that
his spoilers are open. Perhaps some of the open canopy
accidents would have had better outcomes if someone
seeing the incident could have talked to the pilot
with the open canopy and remind them to fly the plane.
People on the ground could remind a glider on final
with his gear up that he/she may want to consider lowering
their gear.
Radios and transponders should be required. In the
world of 1-26s , tube radios, and dry cell batteries
the status quo was reasonable. In today's aviation
environment it is simply wrong.
There...I'm done. I feel better now.
Guy



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glider Crash - Minden? Mitch Soaring 141 September 13th 06 08:31 PM
FLARM Robert Hart Soaring 50 March 17th 06 12:20 AM
Flarm Mal Soaring 4 October 19th 05 09:44 AM
Pilot statistics: SSA vs non-SSA DrJack Soaring 6 March 10th 04 06:55 PM
Safety statistics F.L. Whiteley Soaring 20 September 4th 03 06:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.