A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

East River turning radius



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 14th 06, 05:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default East River turning radius

Mxsmanic wrote:


No, you haven't. It's impossible to hold altitude in a 90° bank.


Sorry, you are wrong. You are presuming that the wings are the only
source of lift on an aircraft. As the original poster said, there
were airshow acts that use the side of the fuselage coupled with a
LOT of power to maintain knifedge level flight.

There's more to aerodynamics than Microsoft would lend you to beleive.
  #2  
Old October 14th 06, 06:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default East River turning radius

In article ,
Ron Natalie wrote:

Sorry, you are wrong. You are presuming that the wings are the only
source of lift on an aircraft. As the original poster said, there
were airshow acts that use the side of the fuselage coupled with a
LOT of power to maintain knifedge level flight.


Q: "How do you get a pig to fly?"
A: "Strap a big enough engine on it"
  #3  
Old October 14th 06, 11:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
d&tm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default East River turning radius


"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Ron Natalie wrote:

Sorry, you are wrong. You are presuming that the wings are the only
source of lift on an aircraft. As the original poster said, there
were airshow acts that use the side of the fuselage coupled with a
LOT of power to maintain knifedge level flight.


You gotta give the boy ( or girl?)some credit for his intelligence and
enquiring mind. But the attitude that goes with it is really something. I
just hope he sticks to flight simming and not the real thing.
terry


  #4  
Old October 15th 06, 02:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default East River turning radius

In article ,
"d&tm" wrote:

You gotta give the boy ( or girl?)some credit for his intelligence and
enquiring mind. But the attitude that goes with it is really something. I
just hope he sticks to flight simming and not the real thing.
terry


He wouldn't last long actually flying. He'd prove Darwin correct when the
airplane doesn't respond like it should (based on his sim experience).

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #5  
Old October 14th 06, 06:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default East River turning radius

Ron Natalie writes:

Sorry, you are wrong. You are presuming that the wings are the only
source of lift on an aircraft.


Wings are the only things under discussion in such theoretical
scenarios.

As the original poster said, there
were airshow acts that use the side of the fuselage coupled with a
LOT of power to maintain knifedge level flight.


I'm sure you could use helium balloons, too, but that isn't an
automatic assumption because it is not universally true.

There's more to aerodynamics than Microsoft would lend you
to beleive.


I don't see any connection with Microsoft here.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old October 14th 06, 08:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33
Default East River turning radius

"Mxsmanic" wrote in
Ron Natalie writes:

Sorry, you are wrong. You are presuming that the wings are the only
source of lift on an aircraft.


Wings are the only things under discussion in such theoretical
scenarios.


No. Whether planes can fly a knife edge is. And, you didn't understand how
this is done.

As the original poster said, there
were airshow acts that use the side of the fuselage coupled with a
LOT of power to maintain knifedge level flight.


I'm sure you could use helium balloons, too, but that isn't an
automatic assumption because it is not universally true.


It isn't even a suggestion.

Did you lose every argument as a child? Is that why you live in a fantasy
world where computer simulation defines your reality?

moo


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Second Helicopter Crash into the East River Bob Chilcoat Piloting 2 June 21st 05 09:50 AM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Military Aviation 1 April 10th 04 12:25 AM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Naval Aviation 0 April 7th 04 08:31 PM
Coordinated turning stall and spins Chris OCallaghan Soaring 20 November 18th 03 09:46 PM
How I got to Oshkosh (long) Doug Owning 2 August 18th 03 01:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.