A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Spin training



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old October 16th 06, 04:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Spin training

"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:23:36 -0400, Stubby
wrote:

I just got back from my spin training for my CFI....

Yup. Should be a requirement before PPL.


I believe it was required long ago, perhaps 30 years. I had a bit of
spin work in the glider. It might be required. It was fun!


Yeah, was eliminated in the late '60s, I think. Basic reason, IIRC, is

that the
number of casualties that occurred during training were thought to be

about
equal to the additional spin fatalities if training WEREN'T required.

Since
most stall/spin accidents occur at very low altitudes (the base-to-final

turn,
usually) the FAA decided to emphasize stall recognition/avoidance,

instead.

True "spin" accidents (those that occur at high enough altitudes to

recover and
not associated with any physical problem with the airplane) are quite

rare.
Canada still requires spin training, and I understand their stall/spin

accident
rate is about the same as the US.

Ron Wanttaja


Back in the early '80s, spin training was not required and was only
marginally available. When I demanded it, after getting a little too close
for comfort on a final turn in the PA-38 Tomohawk, I had to interview more
than one additional instructor before I found one who was comfortable doing
spins.

IMHO the important point was that, once I was comfortable about the spin
entry, it was almost ridiculously easy to fly away from an incipient spin in
the C-150M and C-152. After getting over the initial discomfort, I found
that recovery during the first half turn used very little altitude and
recovering on point after 2 or 3 turns became easy. Both Cessna models
recovered very sharply on command and could have easily been flown away from
a spin entry at below 300 feet.

At that time, I was unable to find an instructor who was comfortable in the
PA-38. It remains my opinion that they simply lacked training and
experience with the aircraft; and therefore believed the scare stories which
circulated. It certainly was no less controllable, and had no less rudder
authority during a stall. Remember that there still a lot of pilots who
believe that turning a twin toward an inoperative engine is less safe than
"Russian Roulette" with 2 cartridges in the ol' wheel-gun.

Peter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 28th 04 12:49 AM
UK change in spin training. W.J. \(Bill\) Dean \(U.K.\). Soaring 2 June 8th 04 08:46 AM
Spin Training Captain Wubba Piloting 25 April 12th 04 03:11 PM
Spin Training JJ Sinclair Soaring 6 February 16th 04 05:49 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 02:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.