Follow up Alright, All You Dashing, Swaggering Bush Pilots

onloser (Building The Perfect Beast) wrote
.What is Building a perfect beast?
Some kind of loonie-tune revelations reference?

No, it is the name of a Don Henley (drummer for the Eagles) album. I found it
fitting considering the fast, very unconventional aircraft which I plan on
building. When I get finished building it it will be a "Beast".

You may really have
reasons, but that does not change your cowardace followed by a
non-participating intrusion asking if pilots travel. That marks you as
a useless troll.

No pac, it marks you as a hot-head who jumps to conclusions. Notice how I
capitalized "Traveling Man". This is an old slang term which Freemasons have
called themselves for years. When I asked if you were a Traveling Man I was
discreetly asking if you were a Freemason. It's not commonly known, and
there's really no reason a non-Mason would know it, so that's why I made the
statement that I knew the answer to my question after you blew up at me.

Pac sezs, Fair enough.

Just how in the hell could I know about your freemason secret
handshake? I thought you were a fundamentalist crackpot "doomsday
prophet" threatening my career with the insinuation that a
professional pilot can not have a religious opinion. I was not the
only one who felt that's what you meant. Finally, you post something
germane to the discussion. O.K. you can stay. :-) I take back the
dickhead part. But if you're going to remain anonymous your going to
have to be happy as a second class citizen around here.


You
obviously had no idea what I meant. So I knew you weren't a Mason. I must
admit though, I certainly saw no harm, and really can't see why you took such
offense at it.

It's not like I called you one of the myriad of names which you
have bestowed on me. And as far as "non-participating intrusion" you better
wake up and smell the coffee. This is Usenet buddy. And, for the record, I
felt my "non-participating intrusion" necessary. Your assertions about the
Patriot Freemasons was correct. However I felt that more needed to be written.
It is vitally important when discussing Freemasons and the Separation of
Church and State that the point is made that Freemasons are NOT anti-religious.
On the contrary, the Fraternity believes in tolerance and acceptance of all
religions. Freemasons are made up of every major religion in the world, and
these men meet together in peace and harmony.

I am a Freemason. I've been a Freemason for over twenty years. I'm from a
family of Freemasons, and my dad will be the head of the Freemasons in my state
in five years. That's one of the reasons that I'm nuking my old post and
answering instead with this more subdued one. My passions get the best of me
at times. But it would appear that I'm not the only one. And I certainly
would not want the Fraternity to get a black eye because of my lack of
restraint.

I've admired you guys for a lot of years. But why in the hell didn't
you just come out and say it? I'm a freemason. I guess that's part
of the thing. You don't attempt to convert others. I like it a lot.

So what, I bit your legg off. I'm a cranky old cargo dog. It's not
going to be the last time either. Good post by the way. (glad I
didn't have to read the other one.)

pacplyer