![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message m... You mean that they will handle IFR traffic up to that altitude not that their controlled space goes up that high. The charted space for Madison is up to 4900 (or something close, I'm not looking at the chart). If I pass overhead of that or under or around, I will monitor but not bother them. However, Madison controllers are extremely accomodating. I have never had them vector me at all. The only time that even came close was a "... transition approved. Cross directly over the airport to stay clear of traffic." I meant what I wrote. The controlled airspace delegated to Madison approach control does not appear on any chart readily available to the flying public. The charted Madison Class C airspace is just a fraction of their delegated airspace. Madison will provide Class C services to all aircraft within the Class C airspace and to all participating aircraft within the outer area. The outer area extends up to the upper limit of the controlled airspace delegated to them within a twenty mile radius of Truax Field. If you're talking to Madison approach within that area you're a participating aircraft and are subject to being vectored if need be to effect separation. Milwaukee, on the other hand, seem very territorial. They are difficult to deal with for practice approaches at Kenosha and they aggressively protect their airspace around MKE by vectoring VFR traffic well clear. Many years ago, I was passing along the lakeshore under their airspace. I called up as a courtesy, got a squawk, then a chewing out for flying so close to their airspace, then vectors further out into Lake Michigan. I responded, "Lake 94P, squawking 1200, will remain clear of your airspace." I've never called them again unless inbound to MKE. If their airspace is busier than the protected areas are designed to support, I sympathize. If they want my cooperation, they need to be nice about it He was completely out of line to chew you out for flying close to the Class C boundary. You can fly right up to the boundary without talking to them. But what courtesy were you extending by calling them? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 05:40 AM |
| terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 10:39 PM |
| Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 10:25 AM |