![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 5 Nov 2006 19:26:57 -0800, "M" wrote:
Andrew Gideon wrote: Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at 25' width and 1800' length. That's a problem? The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10 years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70 KIAS. One of the cues you use for flying a pattern is the aspect ratio of the runway. At 500 feet, 25 x 1800' runway looks the same as a 50 by 3600' runway at 1000'. (Or something like that; my trig is rusty.) So, while you're concentrating on the spot on the ground that doesn't move, your brain is processing other data that says "weird." It can be distracting. Don |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flying our Cardinal south for its new plumage - Long report | Longworth | Owning | 19 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
| Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 06:07 PM |
| Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 04:09 AM |
| SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 04:02 PM |
| IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 08:51 PM |