![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/11/06 17:53, Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Gary Drescher wrote: Even though you got away with it without penalty, it's worth pointing out that you were recklessly endangering others' lives. What you did was analogous to intentionally speeding through a red light at a blind intersection, betting that there won't happen to be any traffic on the cross-street. All true. That's why I started my instrument training as soon as I got back. I was *very* inexperienced. Now, if you'd managed to run into me, I'd wonder why you were flying at a VFR altitude instead of your own IFR altitude? When flying under instrument flight rules, you fly at the altitude assigned by ATC which may or may not be one of the ones mentioned in the FARs (like 91.179, for example). I was at an appropriate VFR altitude for my direction of flight squawking 1200 with an altitude encoder. Of course, we know this doesn't mean you're not responsible for maintaining clearance from clouds. I just mention that in passing. Having flown the same route IFR many times since, I know I was in radar range the whole way, so if you were on an IFR flight plan, you should have gotten a traffic warning about me: "Traffic 12 o'clock, southwest bound, squawking VFR at 4,500, unverified" or words to that effect. That assumes an awful lot. Like that the radar operator was paying attention, that your transponder was working properly, etc. - none of which relieves you of your responsibility to maintain your clearance from clouds. I have said this befo God grants a special dispensation to the young and stupid. Sometimes he rescinds it. In my case, I got away with it. Wouldn't do it now. Personally, I think you should have led with that last paragraph and scrapped the rest of the 'explainations' ;-) Not trying to 'beat you up', but it was your explaining why it wasn't so bad that really got me ;-) Like you've said, you'd never do that sort of thing now. I have a friend that took me for a flight from the Bay Area in California back to Sacramento (this was before I became a pilot) and upon taking off, he flew right through a pretty heavy cloud layer. We were in the clouds for at least a minute before we broke back out. To this day he still says this was ok - and he has several arguments why it was not unsafe. I simply won't fly with him any longer. Best Regards, -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| $640.00 to fill the tanks... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 304 | August 29th 06 03:16 PM |
| UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 07:58 PM |
| Training Day before SSA Convention | Paul Remde | Soaring | 6 | November 10th 05 12:00 AM |
| WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 04:01 PM |