![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Neil Gould writes:
The question becomes which options a buyer might find more attractive, for example would you prefer 3-axis trim or better avionics and moving map GPS? How about a three-axis autopilot with three-axis trim? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stefan writes:
The most simple solution would be the possibility to trim all three axis. Hmm ... is trim in all three axes uncommon? The Baron has aileron, elevator, and rudder trim. On the more expensive level (much more expensive, I would guess), you can overcome the P-factor effects by using two contra-rotating coaxial propellors. This would not only overcome the effects of the P-factor, but also those caused by torque. Kamov helicopters are an example of such a design. With a single powerplant turning in one direction, there would still be some residual torque from the engine itself. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mxsmanic schrieb:
Hmm ... is trim in all three axes uncommon? The Baron has aileron, elevator, and rudder trim. We were talking about singles. Of course, you can always fly the baron on one engine... With a single powerplant turning in one direction, there would still be some residual torque from the engine itself. Yawn. You're talking to a former Moto Guzzi driver. Stefan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... I consider the effects of P-factor and torque to be design defects. By your standards, are bicycles poorly designed because they are unstable at slow speeds? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Foley writes:
By your standards, are bicycles poorly designed because they are unstable at slow speeds? They aren't unstable at slow speeds. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Steve Foley writes: By your standards, are bicycles poorly designed because they are unstable at slow speeds? They aren't unstable at slow speeds. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. I see you know about as much about bicycles as you do about airplanes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve Foley writes:
I see you know about as much about bicycles as you do about airplanes I think I know slightly more about airplanes, but I do know the basic principles of bicycles. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Steve Foley writes: I see you know about as much about bicycles as you do about airplanes I think I know slightly more about airplanes, but I do know the basic principles of bicycles. When you approach stop, a bicycle will fall over to one side or the other. (unless yours still has training wheels). - Note - MXX is intended as a flag to anyone wishing to block my responses to Anthony. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | RomeoMike | Piloting | 6 | December 2nd 06 02:47 AM |
| Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Newps | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 08:40 PM |
| Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Greg Farris | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 08:25 PM |
| HOW MANY GLIDER PILOTS DOES IT TAKE TO CHANGE A LIGHT BULB | Mal | Soaring | 59 | October 4th 05 06:39 AM |
| The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 01:07 PM |