A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Best Fighter For It's Time



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old July 24th 03, 01:07 AM
ANDREW ROBERT BREEN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Emmanuel Gustin wrote:
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message
...

Albatros (not clearly better than a Spad)


It was in service a few crucial months earlier, however,
and its advantage was extended by the initial low production
rate of the SPAD.

Fokker Eindekker


The Eindecker could be claimed to be the *only* fighter of
its time. However, in terms of performance and handling, it
was a rather mediocre aircraft, and its time of superiority
was fairly short.

Me-262


A contemporary with the roughly equivalent Meteor.

F-4 (clearly better than the Mig-21 and the Mirage (maybe))


Not in a dogfight. I admit that it could carry more bombs :-)

I think one aircraft that might be a good candidate is the
Polikarpov I-16, a revolutionary aircraft for its time, and
far ahead of anything until the first Bf 109s entered service.


I'd go for the *just* post-war aircraft, if only because their
competition had been removed! Neuport Nightjar or perhaps Fairey
Flycatcher post-WW1, maybe De Havilland Vampire or Gloster Meteor
IV (a big advance on the wartime Meteor) post WW2. Not. on
paper, perhaps a huge advance on the wartime types, but with all
the bugs worked out, better performance (enough!), better agility,
and familiar enough for available pilots to make the most of them.

Outside those limits, the i-16 is a good choice - a revlutionary
design, and sofar ahead of the competition from other nations as
to be ridiculous. The only trouble was figuring out WYF to do with
it, and even the Soviets weren't that sure, as witness the flip-
flopping back to biplane designs with the I-15bis and the I-153.
Without any way of really testing it there was no way of knowing they'd
really, really got it right - as they had.

Now, with not-fighters the answer is easy. EE Canberra.. Still peerless,
though admittedly as a recon. platform..

--
Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logging time on a PCATD [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 December 18th 04 06:25 PM
FAA Application -- kinds of time Gary Drescher Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 23rd 04 03:33 PM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 06:54 PM
48th Fighter Wing adds JDAM to F-15 arsenal Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 22nd 03 10:18 PM
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? lihakirves Military Aviation 1 July 5th 03 02:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.