![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"chris" wrote in
ups.com: On Apr 3, 2:53 pm, Jose wrote: Really?? But you gotta be clear of cloud, surely!!! Yes, you must be clear of cloud. Depending on the airspace, you must be certain distances away. However, in the US you do not need ground contact. You can fly VFR above a solid overcast. It may not be too bright to do so, depending on circumstances. However, it is legal, and often not a dumb thing to do. Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. Makes me laugh, just a little.. People here have been telling me how dangerous it is to fly without accurate fuel gauges coz you might have a fuel leak or something like that and here you guys are now telling me you can fly above a solid overcast.. What happens if you have an engine failure?? Or get to your destination and you can't get down?? I also wouldn't think you could navigate by using your map if you can't see the surface, so that means using VOR or GPS or something, which I was under the impression are supposed to be secondary to your map reading! But what do I know... :-) In clear VFR, would you fly over water, say between the North and South Island or, in the US, between Ventura and Catalina? If so, you have no option on where to land should you get an engine failure. If you would not such a flight in clear VFR, then you shouldn't fly over a solid overcast. But if you would, what is the difference, especially if you have CAVU and can see your destination? I've done the trip from San Jose to South Lake Tahoe and there have been several times the central valley is fogged in but the fog only came up to 1,000' AGL. The weather in the Santa Clara Valley (San Jose), the mountains west of Sacramento, South Lake Tahoe, and at my cruise altitude, 9,500 MSL, it was CAVU all the way. If I have an engine failure over the central valley, I'm in big trouble as it is often W0X0F on the ground, but I'm in just as much trouble over the mountains or water where I have CAVU. If it's W0X0F, unless I'm CAT IIIc capable, even an instrument rating isn't going to be of much help. I would not go over an extended overcast unless I knew the weather patterns at both my origin and destination and planned alternates. In the mountains, the higher elevation airports often are CAVU when the valley airports are effectively closed due to Tule fog. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why Screeners Miss Guns and Knives (and why pilots miss planes and airports) | cjcampbell | Piloting | 2 | January 3rd 06 05:24 AM |
| Junk Yards | NVArt | Home Built | 5 | July 13th 05 08:35 PM |
| FS Aviation Junk | Jim | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | February 11th 05 11:57 PM |
| Space Junk & GPS Reliability | Doug Carter | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | July 11th 03 02:38 PM |
| Space Junk & GPS Reliability | Dan R | Piloting | 7 | July 11th 03 02:38 PM |