![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Markus Graeber wrote:
On Apr 9, 9:22 am, "Mike Yankee" wrote: DG... has spent to date about EUR 10,000 to do the required testing. Are we supposed to be impressed that DG spends this on the fleet? That is less than it would cost to ship, inspect and repair a single US-based glider! A quick clarification to my original cost translation after carefully re-reading the original German post: The inspection is estimated at EUR 6000 per glider. If a repair is deemed necessary it can easily reach EUR 5000 PER MAIN SPAR. Since a glider has 2 wings with 2 spars we'd end up with a worst case scenario of EUR 16000 per glider and a potential total of some 376 main spars affected in a fleet of some 500 gliders (initial test showed 3 out of 8 main spars defective). 3 of 8 in a sample that size (8) is playing pretty fairly free and loose with statistics. Did DG sample gliders they thought would be affected or did they sample across the entire manufacturing run? The numbers could be much different. Also, since they say they've tested 8 gliders, it costs EUR 6000/glider to test, and they've spent EUR 10,000, I'm assuming they've only tested wrecked gliders. That, or they hired an accountant from Enron. ;-) Shawn |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 9, 11:52 am, Shawn wrote:
3 of 8 in a sample that size (8) is playing pretty fairly free and loose with statistics. Did DG sample gliders they thought would be affected or did they sample across the entire manufacturing run? The numbers could be much different. Also, since they say they've tested 8 gliders, it costs EUR 6000/glider to test, and they've spent EUR 10,000, I'm assuming they've only tested wrecked gliders. That, or they hired an accountant from Enron. ;-) Shawn 8 samples implies that they tested 4 gliders including the one that showed the original defect after a severe landing accident. From what I understand that original glider was repaired and is airworthy again (and for sale by the club in Germany that owns it), it probably is the only one right now with a guarantee that it has no main spar defects and as such can be operated within the old operating limits... I would guess they tested whatever they had at hand and of course the sample might not be representative but all you can go by right now to get an idea of the extend of the problem; especially since Elan is not able/willing to provide any more information as to when they did the change to the wing manufacturing process which can possibly lead to the main spar defects discovered. I assume the EUR 10,000 mentioned is the cost of the load test & tests to destruction they did on affected wings to establish the new operating limitations. Markus |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Beech Duke Owners/ex-Owners ple help... | Stanley | Owning | 12 | June 10th 16 01:36 AM |
| SHK Owners | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | February 7th 06 07:37 PM |
| R22 owners please help with AD 2004-06-52 | rotortrash | Rotorcraft | 20 | April 28th 04 05:33 PM |
| ASW20 owners | Andrew Henderson | Soaring | 0 | April 10th 04 01:28 PM |
| Any UH-1 owners in here? | Jim | Rotorcraft | 7 | October 6th 03 03:33 AM |