![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary Nuttall wrote:
As a glider pilot I act within both my and the glider's limits. I trust my instincts that if something doesn't feel right, I abandon the launch while it's still safe to do so. Maybe it's a US vs UK thing Very likely - how often does a pilot in the UK have to decide if an airport at a 10,000 foot density altitude that has never seen a towplane is safe to use? Here in the USA, I"ll bet we have this problem much more frequently. but here in the UK we take personal responsibility for our actions. I think it's the same here, too. After all, the tow can go bad for several reasons besides a high density altitude tow at an airport that's never been used for towing! And, of course, it's not dependent only on the glider pilot: the towpilot should notice HE'S not off the ground early enough, and let the glider go so the towplane pilot can deal with the towplane's problem. In fact, the combination can still be in trouble even if the glider has taken off "in time", because the critical element is the towplane taking off in time. It's hard for the glider pilot to assess this. What I think Kilo Charlie and the others are trying to determine is if it's even worth taking a towplane to this potential site. Without experience at a similar site, looking for pertinent numbers seems like a better idea than just showing up and trying it. If you're not sure that you have sufficient distance to take-off then why would you trust a set of numbers that say otherwise? Perhaps because you've verified the table or equation in other situations, and added a margin for safety, and because you are using a towplane, towplane pilot, and glider pilot you trust to handle the situation, even if things go wrong. I think the concept of calculating takeoff runs is actually quite interesting but the sheer number of variables involved make it an impracticable exercise. Nonsense. You aren't trying to precisely determine takeoff runs, but decide if the situation is "safe enough". They know how the towplane operates compared to it's POH values, and the addition of the glider can be calculated (it's just drag and weight, not a huge number of variables), so a sensible estimate can be determined. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| measuring arm distances | Heino & Deanne Weisberg | Home Built | 1 | October 21st 05 06:49 PM |
| Stuck at work--need takeoff/landing distances for a 172 please | Yossarian | Piloting | 12 | July 14th 05 02:12 PM |
| Edge distances in steel | Ed Wischmeyer | Home Built | 3 | August 24th 04 11:53 PM |
| Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | General Aviation | 32 | March 25th 04 03:32 PM |
| Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | Piloting | 36 | March 25th 04 03:32 PM |