![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Alan Minyard
writes On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:02:28 +0100, "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Have you seen the plots, Al, or just LockMart propaganda? What aspect and frequency are we discussing? No, I have not seen the plots, but looking at, for instance the forward aspect, the inlets and turbine blades are going to light up a radar at quite a range. You mean before or after the redesign to eliminate just that hotspot? Equivalent value, the Raptor is outnumbered: it's better but not _that_ much better. On current trends the RAF will get more Typhoons than the USAF will Raptors... They will need them. Why? Are we expecting to fight F-22s? -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |