![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 5, 1:16 am, Jim Logajan wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Jim Logajan wrote: .... I did mean di anyone think the invasion if Iraq was a good idea at this juncture? I knew what you meant - sorry, was just playing games with your post. Sadly, some people do still think it was a good idea. Mostly those who want to see a worldwide religious war between supposed Christians and supposed Muslims. Osama bin Laden, for instance, is no doubt pleased a punch. All I remember is that when the Iraq invasion was started I thought our military would have no problem winning (but worried a great deal about a good friend who was serving in the military at the time) - but I had this gut feel that what was planned to happen afterword was clear as mud. I believed they'd find WMD. My thinking was: "No way would this administration launch a war without absolute certainty they would turn up WMD. I mean really - if they didn't they'd be absolute toast, finished, and kaput politically." But no WMD were found and yet they weren't fried politically. There's a lesson in there somewhere. I figured that they would NOT find WMD. First of all, I read an analysis of the evidence and agreed with the authors that is was not persuasive. Secondly, UNMOVIC, using helicopters, arrived at alleged WMD sites within hours of receiving the latest US intel but found nothing. No weapon, no factories, no residues. Many of the sites the US claimed to be active were in the same deserted bombed out non functional condition that they were when UNSCOM last visited. Third, we were caught submitting forged documents to the IAEA. something that would plainly not have been done had there been' real evidence. Fourth, if Saddam Hussein really had fearsome chemical and biological weapons the Bush administration would not have risked massive US casualties by invading. Any lingering doubt was gone by the time Baghdad fell. If Saddam Hussein had any WMD, surely he would have used them by then. What would he save them for, the next US invasion? -- FF |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tom Lanphier: Biggest LIAR in U.S. Military History | CHP52659 | Military Aviation | 5 | January 14th 13 05:35 AM |
| Billy is a bold faced liar. | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 2 | August 5th 04 10:39 PM |
| REPUGNIKONG LIAR EVIL | Grantland | Military Aviation | 2 | March 20th 04 07:37 PM |
| Chad Irby is a Liar | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 23 | February 7th 04 11:23 PM |
| jaun is a liar/ truck titlesJJJJJJ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 21 | November 16th 03 02:49 AM |