![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Brooks wrote: Further to my other post I include the following URL that may put some light on the situation. http://f-111.net/t_no_E.htm There are a couple of fuel dumping measures taken but before an impending crash but the TV and newspaper story I remember didn't have a crash. Richard. Wow! I'd sent an email to the webmaster of that site a couple of years ago about my rambling musings over tail numbers when I was stationed there, but never bothered to check the site. I'm surprised that my words are now posted there. Guess I should check in once and awhile. Couldn't find anything specific to fuel dumping, but I can really only speak to the years that I was there. I don't doubt that it may have happened at some time prior to '83. I'm not sure when the prohibition went into effect. Even so, I'm sure that procedures would have required that it occur at an altitude well above anything that would have endangered any thatched roofs. ;-) I lived on the economy (in Northants) while there and the Oxford Mail was a bit outside my budget. I was paid in dollars and pretty much lived by the exchange rate. The year that the Iron Maiden took on King Arthur I was able to afford a subscription to the Buckingham paper (the title escapes me), but it didn't seem to have much interest in anything other than the market price of rapeseed, so I let it go. The Banbury paper was free (and, therefore, within my budget). I know for a fact that I kept at least one of the Banbury papers with the notorious "world's largest tactical nukes" photos on the front page. I'm just a bit loathe to crawl up into the attic and dig through those boxes to find it in this heat (I live in Arizona, now). Vygg |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vygg wrote:
Richard Brooks wrote: Further to my other post I include the following URL that may put some light on the situation. http://f-111.net/t_no_E.htm There are a couple of fuel dumping measures taken but before an impending crash but the TV and newspaper story I remember didn't have a crash. Richard. Wow! I'd sent an email to the webmaster of that site a couple of years ago about my rambling musings over tail numbers when I was stationed there, but never bothered to check the site. I'm surprised that my words are now posted there. Guess I should check in once and awhile. Couldn't find anything specific to fuel dumping, but I can really only speak to the years that I was there. I don't doubt that it may have happened at some time prior to '83. I'm not sure when the prohibition went into effect. Even so, I'm sure that procedures would have required that it occur at an altitude well above anything that would have endangered any thatched roofs. ;-) It was understood by those who understand that it was nothing to worry about. After all, it had happened and no thatched roofs had set alight so worry over but there were the "what if's" out there and the press love it as you know. I saw it on tv (Central News, office down in Abingdon IIRC) but how much stuff can you keep ? I lived on the economy (in Northants) while there and the Oxford Mail was a bit outside my budget. I was paid in dollars and pretty much lived by the exchange rate. The year that the Iron Maiden took on King Arthur I was able to afford a subscription to the Buckingham paper (the title escapes me), but it didn't seem to have much interest in anything other than the market price of rapeseed, so I let it go. The Banbury paper was free (and, therefore, within my budget). Was it a standard 'freebie' with only the first few pages worth a quick browse and the rest being about the price of houses and cars ? The Oxford Mail archives only go back a few years but I know where I could find out but it's not that important. The Oxford library archives go right back to the start of the last century but think of all those years to guess at! I know for a fact that I kept at least one of the Banbury papers with the notorious "world's largest tactical nukes" photos on the front page. I'm just a bit loathe to crawl up into the attic and dig through those boxes to find it in this heat (I live in Arizona, now). You're not the very same person whom I was in contact with over the 'stealth F-111' at Upper Heyford are you, as I have those slides on the shelf but between being in contact and bringing those slides from Oxford, my PSU regulator died (going high) taking all circuit boards including hard drives with it so all information is sitting dormant. I have photos from that last airshow which was a bit thin on aircraft but it was great to be there. One day soon I'll be throwing those out also. Reduce, reduce, reduce as you can't bury it with you! Richard. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Brooks wrote: Vygg wrote: Richard Brooks wrote: Further to my other post I include the following URL that may put some light on the situation. http://f-111.net/t_no_E.htm There are a couple of fuel dumping measures taken but before an impending crash but the TV and newspaper story I remember didn't have a crash. Richard. Wow! I'd sent an email to the webmaster of that site a couple of years ago about my rambling musings over tail numbers when I was stationed there, but never bothered to check the site. I'm surprised that my words are now posted there. Guess I should check in once and awhile. Couldn't find anything specific to fuel dumping, but I can really only speak to the years that I was there. I don't doubt that it may have happened at some time prior to '83. I'm not sure when the prohibition went into effect. Even so, I'm sure that procedures would have required that it occur at an altitude well above anything that would have endangered any thatched roofs. ;-) It was understood by those who understand that it was nothing to worry about. After all, it had happened and no thatched roofs had set alight so worry over but there were the "what if's" out there and the press love it as you know. I saw it on tv (Central News, office down in Abingdon IIRC) but how much stuff can you keep ? I lived on the economy (in Northants) while there and the Oxford Mail was a bit outside my budget. I was paid in dollars and pretty much lived by the exchange rate. The year that the Iron Maiden took on King Arthur I was able to afford a subscription to the Buckingham paper (the title escapes me), but it didn't seem to have much interest in anything other than the market price of rapeseed, so I let it go. The Banbury paper was free (and, therefore, within my budget). Was it a standard 'freebie' with only the first few pages worth a quick browse and the rest being about the price of houses and cars ? Yep, that's the paper alright. The CNDers pretty much did most of the "reporting" for it. It came in handy though for keeping informed about what was playing at the cinema and who was performing at The Boathouse(?) dinner theater. The Oxford Mail archives only go back a few years but I know where I could find out but it's not that important. The Oxford library archives go right back to the start of the last century but think of all those years to guess at! I know for a fact that I kept at least one of the Banbury papers with the notorious "world's largest tactical nukes" photos on the front page. I'm just a bit loathe to crawl up into the attic and dig through those boxes to find it in this heat (I live in Arizona, now). You're not the very same person whom I was in contact with over the 'stealth F-111' at Upper Heyford are you, I believe so. I remember a conversation here some time back about the "stealth fighter" that we used to show at the base open house. Vygg as I have those slides on the shelf but between being in contact and bringing those slides from Oxford, my PSU regulator died (going high) taking all circuit boards including hard drives with it so all information is sitting dormant. I have photos from that last airshow which was a bit thin on aircraft but it was great to be there. One day soon I'll be throwing those out also. Reduce, reduce, reduce as you can't bury it with you! Richard. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[snipped]
You're not the very same person whom I was in contact with over the 'stealth F-111' at Upper Heyford are you, I believe so. I remember a conversation here some time back about the "stealth fighter" that we used to show at the base open house. Vygg Send me an email with your proper address and I'll send them to you! Richard. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 06:47 AM |
| Declared "minimum fuel" | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 4th 04 03:43 AM |
| Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 26th 04 08:48 AM |
| Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 03:57 AM |
| Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump | Greg Reid | Home Built | 15 | October 7th 03 08:09 PM |