The Angry White Man

On Feb 26, 4:49 am, " wrote:
On Feb 25, 10:59 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

Not really WW1 and 2 were sissy fights, historically
serious war is totally genocidal.

50+ Million killed over 8 years is a "sissy fight"?

It's a matter of proportion, try to keep a global
perspective, eg. Spanish Flu killed more than
WW1 did, something few know about.
Entire races were wiped out in the past, 99%.

From the formation of city states (~5000BC) to the
present, ~7000 years. Each empire believed "Might
is Right", and War = Strength, including economical
but that never happened, otherwise the world would be
unified by force.
The world can be unified but by Benevolent Capitalism,
(according to our simulations).

Hunh? Which? SimCity?

No, the sims were automated.

I read a theory about Spain stealing gold etc. from
America. Spain didn't need to develope a home
based GNP and when the America's gold ran out,
everyone they were purchasing goods from were
far more economically more powerful, because
they had a GNP, Spain had very little.

So you read something --- that's always a good reason to posit some
unsupported theory on global economics, certainly.

I can now tell I likely more "well read" than you,
and with far better comprehesion, your wasting.

I'm still trying to figure out why somebody attacked
the Taliban, it wasn't my decision.

Regards
Ken

The United States "Attacked the Taliban" and overwhelmed the entire
pathetic country in a matter of weeks. This because the Taliban were
Muslim jihadists who harbored and supported those who attacked us on
September 11th, when 2,974 people died --- 246 on four airplanes.

LOL, I guess you'd bomb Sicily to attack organized crime.
Ever heard of NATO?

Dan

Regrads
Ken