![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 29, 7:46*am, "Marco Leon" wrote:
"Denny" wrote in message ... When he does go, some one will steal a really tired looking apache that just happens to be mechanically ready to go anywhere in the world - if there is anyone left who can afford an airplane by then... I know a few guys at my airfield that have given up their airplanes for similar reasons. My question is why don't they opt to get a cheaper alternative like an Archer, Warrior, or C172? Sure it will get you there 15 or 30 minutes later on a normal trip but you have an airplane and retain all the joys of ownership. Unless Dick's missions changes a lot (and it may) a C-172 or Warrior wouldn't be able to do the trips he does. He's used to flying across the country in the turbo altitudes with FAA approved known ice. A C-172 isn't a reliable year-around cross country (literally) machine. Flying 1000 miles in the P-210 is routine. Flying 1000 miles in a C-172 is an adventure. -Robert |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3 Down in last 24 hours | thepearl | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 25th 05 05:29 PM |
| 48.4 hours !? | [email protected] | Soaring | 49 | April 28th 05 01:12 AM |