![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:40:56 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . There was an old saying in the military, "if the minimum weren't good enough, it wouldn't be the minimum." I'll confess, reluctantly, to graduating from college with a 2.01 GPA (2.00 required for graduation.) All I needed was an undergrad degree to get a commission and got to USAF pilot training. (That was when there were a lot of requirements and a low number of qualified candidates--the situation is reversed today.) I'll add, however, that once given the opportunity to compete, then job performance becomes a big factor. When I got the chance, unlikely as it might have seemed based on my undergrad performance, to go to graduate school, I got serious. 4.0 for first MS, 3.95 for second. Pilots, despite what engineer Tarver says, are inherently systems managers, not blue collar equipment operators. In fact, under the law, pilots are equipment operators. An operator, as legislated by the International Brotherhood of Operating Engineers. I'm sorry, but neither military nor commercial aviators are members of the IBOE. The membership may choose to call pilots whatever they wish, but the IBOE doesn't make any "law" that describes nomeclature for pilot skills. IBOE has been around for over 120 years and ahve done a very good job of making sure operating equipment remains a blue collar activity, under the law. While I was at Northrop, the ex-mil aviators on the payroll where definitely "white collar". A delusion only, as militry pilots are inherently blue collar and in the times Ed pretends to recall were a majority physical education majors. Definately neither educated as "white collar", or skilled as managers. What the hell do you mean by "the times Ed pretends to recall"? If you truely remembered then you would also recall that most of your peers would be junior highschool physical education instructors, were they not pilots. In the sixties, when I went to USAF pilot training and flew my first combat tour, the "majority" of pilot candidates were graduates of USAFA (fully one third of my training class came from AFA). All, regardless of commission source were full four year college bachelor degree, and most were engineering specialities. That seems to be quite a select group you were with, Ed. In the seventies when I was directing the Air Training Command Undergraduate Rated Assignments office, we kept stats on input, success rates, causes of failures and output. More than 80% during that decade were graduate engineers and nearly 30% already had graduate degrees on UPT entry. Bull****, most pilots are not engineers. The only place here what you writewas ever true was at the USAF flight test pilot school. snip of fantasy gone completely over the top |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|