Ground School Training Online (PPL, CPL & ATPL)

On Wed, 28 May 2008 10:26:22 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

Peet wrote:
Check this out...

DILANTIN AEROSPACE ACADEMY

http://www.flyandpee.com

You can do your ground school training online... theory & exams.

Awesome site!

The Experimental Aircraft Association needs to slap you with a
restraining order.

Three points.

1) The EAA doesn't own "EAA"
2) The fact that the site is attractive, well laid out, etc has been
compromised by this lame attempt at SPAM
3) When discouraging SPAM, as if you could, DON'T QUOTE AND INCLUDE THE
SPAM ITSELF.

Gezellig wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 10:26:22 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

Peet wrote:
Check this out...

DILANTIN AEROSPACE ACADEMY

http://www.flyandpee.com

You can do your ground school training online... theory & exams.

Awesome site!
The Experimental Aircraft Association needs to slap you with a
restraining order.

Three points.

1) The EAA doesn't own "EAA"

Well actually it does. Along with a bunch of other trademarks.

APPENDIX A
EAA / EAA affiliate Trade Marks and Trade Names
Use of corresponding logos and designs also prohibited
(Combinations also prohibited)
• A Aeronautica®
• Aerobatics USA®
• AirVenture®
• AirVenture Oshkosh™
• AirVenture Today™
• EAA ®
• EAA AirVenture Museum®
• EAA Aviation Foundation®
• EAA Convention™
• EAA Homebuilders™
• EAA Division ™
• EAA Flight Advisor ™
• EAA Flying Start™
• EAA Sport Aviation®
• EAA Sport Pilot®
• EAA Tailwinds™
• EAA Ultralights®
• EAA Vintage®
• EAA Vision of Eagles™
• EAA Wearhouse™
• EAA X-Flyer®
• Experimental Aircraft Association™
• Experimenter®
• Fly With The First Team™
• Flying Start®
• Gateway To Aviation ™
• IAC™ / International Aerobatic Club™
• Kidventure EAA ®
• Mentor™ / NAFI Mentor™
• NAFI™ / National Association of Flight
Instructors™
• Oshkosh™
• Oshkosh Convention™
• Oshkosh 2006™
• Oshkosh Fly-In™
• Sport Aerobatics®
• Sport Aviation Club™
• Sportair®
• The EAA Sky Shoppe™
• The Leader In Recreational Aviation ®
• We Put The Fun In Flying®
• Young Eagles®
• Warbirds of America®
• World’s Greatest Aviation
Celebration®



2) The fact that the site is attractive, well laid out, etc has been
compromised by this lame attempt at SPAM

I'll agree with you there.


3) When discouraging SPAM, as if you could, DON'T QUOTE AND INCLUDE THE
SPAM ITSELF.

In this post it wasn't my intention to discourage SPAM it was my
intention to discourage trademark infringement. And I sent an e-mail to
EAA as well to further that goal.

On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:20:47 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

3) When discouraging SPAM, as if you could, DON'T QUOTE AND INCLUDE THE
SPAM ITSELF.

In this post it wasn't my intention to discourage SPAM it was my
intention to discourage trademark infringement. And I sent an e-mail to
EAA as well to further that goal.

Let me clear my statement then.

When discouraging trademark infringement when the OP wasn't infringing
the trademark, as if you could, DON'T QUOTE AND INCLUDE THE
NON TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT ITSELF.

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Gezellig wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 10:26:22 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

;;;;snip

• Oshkosh™

;;;;snip


How can one tradmark the name of your town?

--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI

"Ross" wrote in message ...
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Gezellig wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 10:26:22 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

;;;;snip

• Oshkosh™

;;;;snip

How can one tradmark the name of your town?

--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI

This is america

Gezellig wrote:

Three points.

1) The EAA doesn't own "EAA"


I believe you'll find that the EAA does own "EAA".

On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:46:39 -0500, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Gezellig wrote:

Three points.

1) The EAA doesn't own "EAA"


I believe you'll find that the EAA does own "EAA".

Not inside the website domain name as the OP used it.

GEAAzellig
So sue me.

Gezellig wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:46:39 -0500, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Gezellig wrote:

Three points.

1) The EAA doesn't own "EAA"


I believe you'll find that the EAA does own "EAA".

Not inside the website domain name as the OP used it.


I wasn't responding to the OP, I was responding to the ignorant jerk that
wrote, "The EAA doesn't own 'EAA'."




GEAAzellig
So sue me.

On Wed, 28 May 2008 18:46:05 -0500, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Gezellig wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:46:39 -0500, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Gezellig wrote:

Three points.

1) The EAA doesn't own "EAA"


I believe you'll find that the EAA does own "EAA".

Not inside the website domain name as the OP used it.


I wasn't responding to the OP, I was responding to the ignorant jerk that
wrote, "The EAA doesn't own 'EAA'."

I was responding the asshole who doesn't understand website domains and
trademarks in an international court setting.

If you happen to see him, take this piece of text and shove it up his
ass.

Yer missin' the point here junior. I have neither the time nor the
legal resources to waste on figuring out who some Usenet tit sucker
is. But then I'm just some J. Doe with an agenda of correcting the
clueless bull**** you tit suckers spit up in groups like this so
anyone with a legitimate need for knowledge doesn't end up thrashing
about because your wretch went unchallenged.

If I were even mildly interested in spanking you literally, and
sufficiently funded, I know just where to drive the bar in to wedge open
and yank you out in the open just like the vet did the day they yanked
you from your mother's crotch.

Gezellig wrote:

I wasn't responding to the OP, I was responding to the ignorant jerk
that wrote, "The EAA doesn't own 'EAA'."

I was responding the asshole who doesn't understand website domains
and trademarks in an international court setting.

If you happen to see him, take this piece of text and shove it up his
ass.


Sorry, I'd be happy to provide additional assistance, but I've seen nothing
you describe in this thread.



Yer missin' the point here junior.


No, the point is you don't know what you're talking about. I got that
immediately.



I have neither the time nor the
legal resources to waste on figuring out who some Usenet tit sucker
is. But then I'm just some J. Doe with an agenda of correcting the
clueless bull**** you tit suckers spit up in groups like this so
anyone with a legitimate need for knowledge doesn't end up thrashing
about because your wretch went unchallenged.


You're not in a position to correct anyone here.



If I were even mildly interested in spanking you literally, and
sufficiently funded, I know just where to drive the bar in to wedge
open and yank you out in the open just like the vet did the day they
yanked you from your mother's crotch.


Bold talk, but that's all it is. You can believe me when I say you're
simply not capable of that.