![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clark wrote in
: Most SOPs I am familiar with for heavy aircraft tell you to keep flying if a Master Caution illuminates on takeoff AFTER 80-100 knots. After 80-100 knots, hi speed aborts are done for Fires, Engine Failures, Windshear and if the PIC believes the airplane will not fly. This crew had no idications to warrant an abort. After a certain threshold they are biased to continue and that is what they did, similar to Comair 5191. Blaming the pilots does not "un-crash" this aircraft. There are system issues to be corrected here. I'm glad they survived. Exactly, though you're whislting in the wind here trying to explain that to them.. However, we usually have the proviso attached to all briefs that we'll still abandon up to V1 for aything that makes the airplane unflyable. Instrument failure ins't that big a dal if you'r VMC in most airplanes, but I have no idea how reliant the flight control systems in that thing are on the sensors. My guess would be that the reliance would be considerable, though. This is one in which a lot of clear answers wont be forthcoming for some considerable time, though. I can't imagine the USAF would want any weaknesses that aircraft has discussed in public. You might see exactly what happened on the discovery channel in 2058. For a very good read on time compressed decision making and concurrent task management, get a copy of "The Limits of Expertise: Rethinking Pilot Error and the Causes of Airline Accidents" by Dismukes, Berman and Loukopoulos http://www.amazon.com/Limits-Experti...-Accidents/dp/ 0754649652 Hmmm, thnk i might get that.. Bertie |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|