A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

early powered flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old December 8th 03, 06:43 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kim Dammers" wrote in message
om...
There is no serious evidence, photographic or otherwise,
that Whitehead ever managed to fly his aircraft. The best
that can be produced is a claim by Whitehead himself, and
the man seems to have been more than a little prone to
exaggeration.


Contemporary newspaper articles, one of which is from the local paper
and describes the flight constitute serious evidence, albeit not
proof. In addition, at least two alleged eye-witnesses later signed
sworn affidavits.


Unfortunately history tells us that both newspaper stories and
witness testimony given years after the even are of doubtful
value in this regard. Had the aircraft flown on a number of occasions
that wouldof course have been different.

They have built a "replica" of the No.21
(despite the complete lack of plans), equipped it with a modern
engine, and managed to get it briefly into the air.


The Flugpionier-Gustav-Weißkopf-Museum photos depict what certainly
looks like more than "briefly" being in the air (remember, the Wright
Bros.' craft was catapulted and didn't go very far either).


The description of what happened however is that it flew 500 metres
but was equipped with modern 2 stroke counter rotating engines

The difference with regard to the Wrights was they kept on
flying their aircraft and refined it into a useful flying machine

A one off flight of doubtful provenance is no substitute for continued
endeavour.

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 08:16 PM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 06:54 PM
Sim time loggable? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 6th 03 08:47 AM
human powered flight patrick timony Home Built 10 September 16th 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.