Good Luck, Jim!

On 12 Oct 2003 19:37:45 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote:

In article , Ron Wanttaja says...

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:20:01 GMT, "Juan Jimenez"
Ah yes, the moral values of the one who never brings anything he owns and
can't afford to lose to SNF.

I've heard he only wears six of his ten Rolexes to SnF. But that's to make
his hands faster when he steals chicken.... :-)

Ron all I can say is that poor jaun is so uninformed. Lets see I brought my new
Dodge Ram truck to SnF in 1998 ,1999 and my next new one in 2000 ,2001
2002 and 2003 .I just bought another new one that I'll be bringing to SnF in
2004. Credibility, it's still about credibility and "mini zoom" doesn't have any
more credibility then his hero.

By the way I just got a letter from Garfield Hts. Municipal court which stated
that "after review of plaintiff (G.Conn) and defendant's (Chuck S/CGS Aviation)
Brief's, Defendant's motion to quash debtor's exam of defendant Charles
Slusarczyk is granted." Case # is CUH0300308 the judgement was issued
10/09/03. It seems to say as I have been saying all along that I personally
didn't owe Conn any money. More details later after I talk to my attorney. I can
see Tony smiling right now and I can hear him saying now you can go after zoom
and Conn for all the money they cost you. Hmmmmm

Actually Ron I like to wear my deer hunting watch with the light up dial so's I
can tell time in the dark :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Go for it, Chuck!!!

I doubt Zoom will have any assets to attach but it would be
nice to see him nailed for his actions.

John

In article , John Ammeter says...

Go for it, Chuck!!!

I doubt Zoom will have any assets to attach but it would be
nice to see him nailed for his actions.

John

I'm seriously considering that venue, zoom has cost me a lot and I feel he
should be held accountable for things he has done not only to me but to a lot of
people. I'm getting my ducks in order and believe it or not I 'm following an
outline that Tony gave me as to the course of an action against zoom and conn.
He felt I had a solid case against both of them and the only way to deal with
them was a court action. I'll see.

See ya

Chuck RAH-15/1 ret

"evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil is still nuts" anon