Good Luck, Jim!

From what I've seen over the last couple of years, he has no "rocks" to get
off.

Must be some other motivation.

John Stricker

"John Ammeter" wrote in message
...
Chuck,

Juan is merely a troll. He gets his rocks off from
irritating posts. Every post he makes that someone responds
to is just another stroke for him.

Personally, I'd recommend you simply ignore him and spend
your time nailing Campbell in court.

John


On 13 Oct 2003 20:11:13 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote:

In article ,
Juan_Jimenez
says...

How about putting some money where your mouth is ?

No need to put money anywhere. Just post the entire title, and proof
that
it's been to SNF.

I guess you lack the courage of your convictions to put up or shut
up.What's the
problem ? If what you say is true you should be willing to put up $1000
or more
it shouldn't matter ...if your right. Or is it maybe your the one who
just put
your foot in your mouth? .It's all about credibility and here's your
chance to
show who's credible you or me...Since I'm sure zooms the one who's
feeding you
your info maybe he should ante up the money for the bet. Maybe you'll
learn a
little about zooms credibility in the process.


Sure the one with the judgment is George Conn I never made it a
secret...

...and nobody's ever sued you successfully. Unhuh.


Oh so we're back to word games again.Ok tell me what "succesfully sued "
means
to you and I can answer.


When did I say he was the person responsible for forcing me to keep
my
property out of Sun n Fun. Listening to zoom again?

Oh, so you do admit that what I said was true. Gotcha.

You got nothing..I never said conn or anyone else was forcing me to keep
my
property out of SnF, your the one making that claim.


It has everything to do with it .

No, it does not. A denial of a motion for a debtor's exam is not a
dismissal
of a judgement.

Your not paying attention again. The Judgment against CGS Aviation "INC"
,the
OLD company, the defunct Company ,the non existent since 1986 company is
the
company that has the judgment against it. Not me ...not CLM Marketing Inc
or the
current CGS Aviation.I never said it was dismissed your saying it, the
judgment
against CGS Aviation INC still stands and that's who conn should be after
not
me. He was trying to make me personally responsible for the debt of a
defunct
out of business corporation. Even you should be able to tell the
difference...
Well probably not.

Just for the record are you saying I personally owe conn money? Are you
also
saying that I gypped conn out of his deposit he paid to a dealer? Put
some
definitive statements out here in public,no beating around the bush or
vague
generalities.


Still having a nice day

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon