A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What a shock!!! Lockheed is over budget on the F-35



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old January 12th 04, 05:00 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:55:54 +1100, John Cook
wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:41:12 -0600, Alan Minyard
wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:51:06 +1100, John Cook

wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:26:57 GMT, "Mitch Benjamin"
wrote:

Lockheed Martin Corp.'s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is projected to cost

$5.1
billion, or 17%, more than budgeted, forcing a one-year delay and a

cut in
the number of planes produced, according to Pentagon documents.

And only two years into the program.



I also heard that at the last design review that the STOVL is 350kg
overweight, but still within the "not over this weight" catagory, but
more alarming is the CV which is 35% overweight....

I also heard they were reviewing the quick build method (where large
sections are bolted together with quick mate surfaces) to a more
time consuming and labour intensive conventional method to save a few
hundred kilos the quick build method entails.



Cheers


John Cook

Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All
opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them.

Email Address :-
Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me
Eurofighter Website :-
http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk

What you "heard" is bullsh** You are not on the design team, and

certainly
are not cleared for such information.


Hmmm... It maybe bull! but it was published in "Aero Australia" so
you don't need to be so aggressive in your post and while I'm not on
the design team I can gain certain insights into a program from
numerous sources....

I'll post an exerpt from the article below, and you can assess it for
yourself...

Perhaps if you have any real insight you could share it with everyone
here on RAM, I really would like to know if the rumours are
true...


Quote:-




I've seen the thing about assembly going back to the old way rather
than doing it modular like they did with the F-22 but I've never seen
the 35% increase in weight mentioned anywhere. I'd think 35% would
make headlines EVERYWHERE


It wouldn't matter what was pubished, Ferrin. You would still make the same
ass of yourself WRT Lockmart products.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shock Chord Rings smjmitchell Home Built 1 September 9th 04 08:41 AM
Lockheed Lancer? Brendan Grace Military Aviation 13 January 5th 04 04:42 AM
6 reported slain at Lockheed Martin facility in Mississippi Bertie the Bunyip Military Aviation 60 July 15th 03 11:23 AM
USA Defence Budget Realities Stop SPAM! Military Aviation 17 July 9th 03 03:11 AM
Shooting at a Lockheed Martin plant Quant Military Aviation 0 July 8th 03 06:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.