What a shock!!! Lockheed is over budget on the F-35

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

I only quote public sector published information on the F-22.

Except for the stuff you can't quote, like the strakes thing.

Even the Lockmart email posted here assuring us that the titanium tail spar
is the fix for the F-22's tail problems mentions the strakes, Chad.

Funny, I can't seem to find that in Google. Refresh our memory on that
one (or are you imagining it again?).

this thread is about problems with the F-35, please focus.

But *this* part of the thread is about your tenuous connection with
reality. And funny how it wasn't about the F-35 when you posted this:

I can dig you up articles where Lockmart suggests they will be trying
strakes and then another where Lockmart calls strakes the least apealing
solution to their "buffeting" problems, but you could do that yourself.

Still waiting for that "digging," Tarver.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

I only quote public sector published information on the F-22.

Except for the stuff you can't quote, like the strakes thing.

Even the Lockmart email posted here assuring us that the titanium tail
spar
is the fix for the F-22's tail problems mentions the strakes, Chad.

Funny, I can't seem to find that in Google. Refresh our memory on that
one (or are you imagining it again?).

It was posted here for all to see, Chad.

Your cognitive abilities are not my problem.

Now, get back to discussing the F-35's problems.

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Even the Lockmart email posted here assuring us that the titanium
tail spar is the fix for the F-22's tail problems mentions the
strakes, Chad.

Funny, I can't seem to find that in Google. Refresh our memory on that
one (or are you imagining it again?).

It was posted here for all to see, Chad.

Suuure it was, Tarver. Except that you should know by now that not all
posts make it to all servers, and it might not have made it past your
host.

So since it was "here for all to see," you should be able to find it in
mere moments, and repost it "for all to see," since nobody else seems to
have seen it. Don't forget to include the original article ID. Or give
us a groups.google.com link to the original.

So if that post actually *did* exist, it should be child's play for you
to find it, and settle the matter once and for all. Unless it didn't
exist, in which case you're going to tell us that it's my problem for
not trusting your word that it exists.

Your cognitive abilities are not my problem.

Ah, there we go. Pass that buck...

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.