![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 19, 9:07*pm, PaPa Peng wrote:
The officer said that significantly reducing the new aircraft's radar cross-section will require more than stealth outer coatings. New integrated design and shaping as well as coatings are needed, the officer was quoted as saying in the magazine's Nov. 13 article on the new Chinese jet. Been away from this group for some time. *Question. *Dogfighting has no place in modern aerial combat. * Presumably long before the enemy comes within visual range onboard sensors would have decteted the opponent and high performance guided missiles fired. *No one gets near enough to fire his guns. *So what is the advantage in super maneuverability in the design specs of the plane? *In all the videos I have seen where the pilot tries to demonstrate the superior performance of his aircraft nothing the pilot had done could possibly escape a locked-on missile. The second question is on stealth. *Again you don't want to come within shooting range of the enemy. *Dive bombing a well defenced target is sucidal. *Against defenseless third world countries any old ordinary plane can do the job. So against a well defended target one tries to launch the munition from as far away as possible. *Once the munition is launched the plane reveals it location and has to scramble out of the way. *Its pointless to hang around anyway since the mission is already (launch the munition) and you don't want to risk a multimillion dollar plane and the pilot. Therefore what critical advantages do stealth and high maneuverablity confer to 5th generation aircraft to justify the cost, long development times and technical complexity. The whole "kill'em before they can reach" sounds really interesting in theory and probably will eventually work in practice. But I just don't think it's gonna be an smooth ride just like gun and powder didn't replace sword and spear overnight, we all know, at the initial stage, rudimentary musket was no match for arrow and bow. Anyway, the bottom line is this theory has never really been seriously tested in real combat. So before jumping with your two feet into it, it'd be prudent to hedge your bet by maintaining skills proven to be needed. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who Is in Control of China's Aircraft Carriers? | Sound | Home Built | 2 | March 10th 07 08:48 PM |
| "Bravo Sierra" check (was "China's Army on Combat Alert") | redc1c4 | Military Aviation | 19 | April 3rd 04 10:21 PM |
| The "Lightweight" Fighter is on the verge of overtaking the F-105 as the heaviest single engine fighter of all time. Talk about irony. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 1 | November 24th 03 04:12 PM |
| China's Chengdu J-10 Fighter - Big Trouble? | Kevin Brooks | Military Aviation | 0 | November 18th 03 03:06 PM |