![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"PaPa Peng" wrote in message ... I am still not used to posting procedures. Anyway two points I want to make. 1. The US wouldn't dream of threatening China by sailing of a carrier group in the Taiwan Straits or in "International waters" close to China at this stage of the game. The political fallout wouldn't be worth whatever that show of force is supposed to achieve. The political atmosphere will really have to be rotten before the US tries rattling sabers on China. No chance of that happening any time soon. 2. The US cannot threaten China with nuclear weapons. Say the worst case scenario does happen and there is a nuclear exchange. Both countries will be damaged severely. The consequence will be the world will be really freaked out. The unintended consequence is that Russia remains intact and has a huge nuclear arsenal. She can now call all the shots and gets to dictate to the world. With Russia as the world's hagemon there is no one who will be able to challenge her leadership for a long long time. As the strategic balance of power now stands China is secure against being invaded or have to fight a war inside China against a foreign force. All of China's neighbors are significantly weaker and do not pose a threat. None will be foolish enough to allow the US to form a military alliance with them to confront China. Russia is in strategic balance with China. Russia's population is too small and she shares a long land border with China. China has no cause to invade Russia as Russian lands are thinly populated for a good reason. They are unsuitable for agriculture., landlocked and too cold most of the year to be economically viable. China's competitive strategy will therefore remain what she is doing today. This is to prosper through manufacturing and through trade. This is what the US and the rest of the world has to compete against. The US and the rest of the world may fear China's rise enough to gang up against her. That's something China will have to deal with but it won't be a shooting war. China will continue developing her defense capabilities. This is to maintain a credible deterrence against an outside power, aka the US since only the US harbours ambitions for military dominance. The costs and effort to maintain defense is a lot easier and cheaper on national resources. The US won't be able to spur China into a ruinous arms race and bankrupt her. China is a long way from militarily being able to threaten the U.S. a nuke exchamnge would be bad for the U.S. annhiliation for china. also the spirit of Tianemen Sq is lurking just below the surface, bodies start coming home, only son bodies at that and its curtins for the Party. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who Is in Control of China's Aircraft Carriers? | Sound | Home Built | 2 | March 10th 07 08:48 PM |
| "Bravo Sierra" check (was "China's Army on Combat Alert") | redc1c4 | Military Aviation | 19 | April 3rd 04 10:21 PM |
| The "Lightweight" Fighter is on the verge of overtaking the F-105 as the heaviest single engine fighter of all time. Talk about irony. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 1 | November 24th 03 04:12 PM |
| China's Chengdu J-10 Fighter - Big Trouble? | Kevin Brooks | Military Aviation | 0 | November 18th 03 03:06 PM |