![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim Logajan writes: Actually the posting explicitly claims they didn't actually overfly their destination - they at first thought they had. Radar records would indicate whether this was true. Here you go: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N...135Z/KSAN/KMSP Thanks. According to the detailed tracklog, http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N.../KMSP/tracklog they were almost directly overhead MSP at 9:04 PM traveling ~604 MPH. The tracklog shows a turnaround begin at 9:14 PM. If they did start checking their location at around 9:04 to 9:06, then it seems likely they would have spent a couple minutes first verifying their wayward location and then a few more realizing and then correcting the frequency setting problem. Though 8 to 10 minutes to resolve those problem seems a tad on the long side, though not improbable. So the e-mail's claim about when they became aware of their lax navigation could indeed be true, just not verifiable or exculpatory even if true. Looks like the FAA has placed time-stamped transcripts and audio files here that indicate they made contact with Minneapolis center at about 9:14: http://www.faa.gov/data_research/acc...nt/2009-10-23/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| National Seashore/bird sanctuary overflight altitudes? | TonyR | Piloting | 2 | November 19th 06 12:13 AM |
| Grand Canyon overflight proposal | john smith | Piloting | 71 | April 23rd 06 06:30 AM |
| Niagara Falls overflight | Bartscher | Piloting | 8 | May 31st 04 10:31 PM |
| Canada overflight question | SeeAndAvoid | Piloting | 15 | February 1st 04 11:00 PM |