![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Spiv" wrote in message ... 1948 -Vickers Nene Viking (World's first pure jet transport) made first flight in April, followed in July by prototype Viscount 630 (world's first turboprop airliner). It carried pasengers, but nmot fare paying. The Nene Viking was not a jet transport. It was a propeller transport that served briefly as a jet engine testbed. It never served as an airliner. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message hlink.net... "Spiv" wrote in message ... 1948 -Vickers Nene Viking (World's first pure jet transport) made first flight in April, followed in July by prototype Viscount 630 (world's first turboprop airliner). It carried pasengers, but nmot fare paying. The Nene Viking was not a jet transport. It was. It was a propeller transport that served briefly as a jet engine testbed. No. It was plane with jet engines and seats for people inside. It never served as an airliner. It did. It never took paying passengers. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Spiv" wrote in message ... It was. The Nene Viking was an engine test bed. No. It was plane with jet engines and seats for people inside. Airplanes without seats are called UAVs. It did. It never took paying passengers. That's how you can tell it was not an airliner. Airliners carry paying passengers. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message hlink.net... "Spiv" wrote in message ... It was. The Nene Viking was an engine test bed. No. It was plane with jet engines and seats for people inside. Airplanes without seats are called UAVs. It did. It never took paying passengers. That's how you can tell it was not an airliner. Airliners carry paying passengers. It was a people carrying jet. Is that better for you. Do you now understand. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Spiv" wrote in message ... It was a people carrying jet. So was the Meteor. Is that better for you. Do you now understand. I'm trying to help you understand. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message link.net... "Spiv" wrote in message ... It was a people carrying jet. So was the Meteor. That was man o war only carrying people who flew it. Is that better for you. Do you now understand. I'm trying to help you understand. Please don't help me. I can't think down to that level of yours. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Spiv" wrote in message ... That was man o war only carrying people who flew it. But a people carrying jet, just as the Nene Viking. Neither carried people for compensation as jet airliners do. Please don't help me. If you don't want help why are you here? I can't think You've made that clear, but if you put forth a bit of effort you might be able to. You're young, there is much for you to learn. If you change your attitude you can acquire a lot of information from these forums. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .net,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Spiv" wrote in message ... It was a people carrying jet. So was the Meteor. While even appearing to align myself with the egregious and unnecessary spiv on any topic whatsoever is a truely repellant concept, the Nene Viking did represent a significant step towards the passenger-carrying jet in a way that the Meat-Box didn't (as the first jet-to-see-production to fly[1], the Meteor has enough significance to keep it going). The Nene Viking was certainly the first mating of an airliner fuselage to jet power and the first jet to be capable of employment as an airliner (engine and type certification aside). None of this was true of earlier designs, unless you were going to adopt the approach to passenger-carrying of the BOAC Mosquitoes. Unlike any earlier jet, the Nene Viking was capable of airline service (given engine and type certification - the latter never being sought for the good reason that it wouldn't have made a half-good airliner), albeit hopelessly uneconomically (which was why it was never developed as an airliner). To be sure, the mating of jets and an airliner fuselage (as opposed to mating jets to a bomber, which was common with testbeds) was going to happen soon, but the Nene Viking was the first example and deserves a certain amount of credit as such. [1] and, with one example still in regular use (with Martin-Baker Ltd, but carrying an RAF serial), the jet with the longest service history. -- Andy Breen ~ Speaking for myself, not the University of Wales "your suggestion rates at four monkeys for six weeks" (Peter D. Rieden) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"ANDREW ROBERT BREEN" wrote in message ... The Nene Viking was certainly the first mating of an airliner fuselage to jet power and the first jet to be capable of employment as an airliner (engine and type certification aside). The Nene was not mated to the Viking airframe to produce an jet-powered Viking airliner, it was purely for the development of the Nene engine. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | February 1st 04 12:39 AM |
| All Vietnam Veterans Were Awarded The Vietnam Cross of Gallantry | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 1st 03 01:07 AM |
| Vietnam, any US planes lost in China ? | Mike | Military Aviation | 7 | November 5th 03 12:44 AM |
| Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 04:09 AM |
| Attorney honored for heroism during the Vietnam War | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 6 | August 15th 03 12:59 AM |