![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 27, 12:21*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)"
wrote: Discussion invited. Is there a conflict between rule 10.9.5.3 and rule 11.2.2.4? 10.9.5.3 says the safety finish is only valid if no more points were claimed after the finish fix: "10.9.5.3 When a Safety finish is active, a pilot may (using a Task Claim form - Rule 10.5.1.3.1) claim a finish by obtaining one fix within the Safety finish cylinder, provided the slope from the claimed fix to the Projected Finish Location is not less than 200 feet per mile and no claimed turnpoint was achieved after the time of the claimed fix." But 11.2.2.4 is intended to allow a new task attempt after finishing: "11.2.2.4 Task completion – The pilot has completed the task if all turnpoints are valid, yield a scored distance (Rule 11.2.3) not less than the Standard Minimum Task Distance, and the pilot obtained a scored start time, a finish time prior to finish closing, and either landed at the contest site or after finishing obtained a valid start (10.8.5) and a subsequent fix at least 5 miles from the start fix. Otherwise the task is incomplete. Appendix This rule allows a pilot to finish a task and then make another attempt without having to land and without jeopardizing the results of the first attempt. The change also ensures that a pilot who finishes so low that s/he fails to reach the airfield cannot claim s/ he was off on a second task attempt." What happens if a pilot make a valid safety finish then waits for the weather to clear, restarts, and makes a second task attempt that is abandoned after the first turnpoint? It appears that the the first task attempt is invalidated because a claimed turnpoint was achieved after the safety finish fix. Does there need to be some language in 10.9.5.3 that allows a second task attempt? Andy |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USA 2010 Competition Rules Committee Minutes Posted | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 43 | December 23rd 10 03:33 AM |
| 2011 USA competition schedule ? | Dave Nadler | Soaring | 22 | October 19th 10 09:07 PM |
| Proposed US Competition Rules Changes for 2010 | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | December 17th 09 06:20 PM |
| 2008 Proposed US Competition Rules Changes | [email protected] | Soaring | 18 | December 31st 07 08:21 PM |
| Proposed 2005 Rules On SRA Site | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 79 | January 27th 05 07:51 PM |