![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message news ![]() In message , ArtKramr writes Here are some more caveats from my training. When you issue and order to a subordinate there are only three answers allowed. They a 1. YES SIR 2. NO SIR 3. NO EXCUSE SIR I can see why that would work for your situation. That regime would be moderately disastrous for the officer training I went through, however. The overriding rule was "What would my CO want me to do if he was here?" The classic example given (apologies for discourse...) snip good example Because Rupert knows what his overall mission is (to seize that bridge intact!) he can ask "What would my CO tell me to do if he could see what I see now?" and hopefully decide to lead 1 Platoon in a snap attack on the bridge, driving off the sappers before they complete their demolitions and hoping to be relieved before an enemy counterattack. Excellent example of why the commander has to explain his intent, and its overriding importance compared to the actual ordered tasks, Paul. Art won't admit it, but even during his day the "orders are orders" mentality was generally eschewed (by good leaders) in favor of meeting the more important intent behind the orders. Your example is a little bit remindful of a case where US units did push forward to seize a bridge that they were no specifically directed to gain...a little place called Remagen mught stir even Art's faded memories. Remember that I wasn't in the Air Force. I was in the Army Air Corps, emphasis on ARMY and went through a full schedule of combat infantry training as well as flight school and as an officer as well.. Good thing too because during the Battle of the Bulge we were all issued M-1 Carbines and thrown into the line along with the XXX Corps. And I never ever heard any long discussions involving diverse opinions on what we should do. Orders were issued and were followed without question. We knew what we should do and we did it. Did you know what your unit was meant to achieve, or were you just told just "sit in this hole and cover these arcs and shoot anyone in feldgrau not waving a white flag"? Seriously - we've worked hard to get to "mission command", which is where on the one hand you have your orders but on the other you know what you're meant to be achieving and what the Big Picture (typically two levels up) is. You don't rewrite your orders but you _do_ understand that the real world changes faster than your CO can keep giving you updates. Again, the key phrase: "if my commander was here with me now, what would he want me to do?" And remember we won that war so maybe we knew something back then that the military has forgotten since. We've been fairly successful over here since 1945. The one doing the forgetting in this case is not the US (or UK) military establishments, that is quite obvious. Brooks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A problem in the Military ? | Nick Jade | Military Aviation | 54 | March 15th 04 08:59 PM |
| bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 05:26 PM |
| Fire officer tops in field — again | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 13th 03 09:37 PM |
| Army officer recieves Tuskegee Airman Award | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 21st 03 10:15 PM |
| Officer at Peterson AFB to be disciplined | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 14th 03 03:58 AM |