A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Future military fighters and guns - yes or no ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 2nd 04, 08:09 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Puppinator" wrote in message
...
Just out of curiousity...what EXPERIENCE do you have working/flying the
A-10? Or do you just quote from Janes and/or CNN.


Oh, goodie. Another Art-in-the-making. Never flew an A-10, obviously. Do
happen to know that your "the gun is their main armament" is about twenty
years out of date, if not more (ISTR Mavericks were included in their
warloads from the beginning). The gun was not their primary method of attack
during ODS, nor was it during OIF. If you think it is now, or was during
those conflicts, provide some sort of evidence that supports that theory.

Brooks



--
Pup
USAF, Retired
Go #88 UPS Racing, Detroit Red Wings,
Ohio State Buckeyes
__________________

"Puppinator" wrote in message
...
On the contrary...I don't believe "modern fighters" need a gun..is that
putting it better...however, the A-10 is classified as an "attack"

a/c...and
before retrofits, it's primary weapon was the gun...could use it

remarkable
well...and with more variety of PGU 30mm ammunitions than that available

to
F-16's or F-15s...bottom line, the A-10 was design to use its gun on a

daily
basis...the F boys weren't.

--
Pup
USAF, Retired
Go #88 UPS Racing, Detroit Red Wings,
Ohio State Buckeyes
__________________

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"Puppinator" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"Puppinator" wrote in message
...

Ok, let me explain a little deeper...the A-10 is the only on

currently
full
up operational that needs a gun....as it is it's primary weapon.

It is? Not from what I have heard about A-10 operations. The

Maverick,
along
with various bombs (guided and dumb) seem to be its primary

armament,
and
the gun is secondary.

I only know this from working 6 years on the A-10 and it's initial

primary
mission: CAS....but since the A-10 has been multi-roled, those lines

have
blurred. Initially, it was the gun for CAS/Tank Killer roles.

I am getting the distinct impression you are not going to back off

from
the
various incorrect assertions you have made in this thread (to wit:

only
the
A-10 needs a gun and it's primary weapon is the gun, can't do CAS from

10K,
failure to recognize that even the F-16 has indeed engaged in strafe
operations during both ODS and OEF, etc.). C'est la vie.

Brooks


--
Pup
USAF, Retired
Go #88 UPS Racing, Detroit Red Wings,
Ohio State Buckeyes
__________________











 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best dogfight gun? Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 317 January 24th 04 07:24 PM
Remote controled weapons in WWII Charles Gray Military Aviation 12 January 21st 04 06:07 AM
Why did Britain win the BoB? Grantland Military Aviation 79 October 15th 03 04:34 PM
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality ArtKramr Military Aviation 131 September 7th 03 10:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.