A problem in the Military ?

Sunny wrote:
We have to do something about
this. I can't accept that it will never get fixed. What I don't know is
what to do. Do we send this story to our military leaders in the hopes
that
they will "fix it"? I've seen another version of this story (see my
earler
post) and I'm sure there are more like it, so maybe the "word" is out?
I'm all for males and females in the Army, but there has got to be
something
that can be done to stop problems like this.

Got news for you. As long as boys and girls serve together,
there's going to be hanky-panky going on. Some of said
hanky-panky will involve cases where one or both (or more?)
of the players are married. To other people. Anyone who tries
to stop it will just look like an idiot. You could make it a
capital offense and it would still happen, even if you were
dealing with servicemembers who are not in a life-threatening
environment.

This is a fact of life in our society, it happens in every workplace
today and every day.

And publishing the names of the allegedly involved parties
is scurrilous.



Jeff

Good points, perhaps you are right. Perhaps it is just Human nature.
As for the names, I agree, but since this posting was already posted (I just
copied it) I felt the "damage" was already done.

Sunny

"Jeff Crowell" wrote in message
...
Sunny wrote:
We have to do something about
this. I can't accept that it will never get fixed. What I don't know
is
what to do. Do we send this story to our military leaders in the hopes
that
they will "fix it"? I've seen another version of this story (see my
earler
post) and I'm sure there are more like it, so maybe the "word" is out?
I'm all for males and females in the Army, but there has got to be
something
that can be done to stop problems like this.

Got news for you. As long as boys and girls serve together,
there's going to be hanky-panky going on. Some of said
hanky-panky will involve cases where one or both (or more?)
of the players are married. To other people. Anyone who tries
to stop it will just look like an idiot. You could make it a
capital offense and it would still happen, even if you were
dealing with servicemembers who are not in a life-threatening
environment.

This is a fact of life in our society, it happens in every workplace
today and every day.

And publishing the names of the allegedly involved parties
is scurrilous.



Jeff

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:44:08 -0700, "Jeff Crowell"
wrote:

Sunny wrote:
We have to do something about
this. I can't accept that it will never get fixed. What I don't know is
what to do. Do we send this story to our military leaders in the hopes
that
they will "fix it"? I've seen another version of this story (see my
earler
post) and I'm sure there are more like it, so maybe the "word" is out?
I'm all for males and females in the Army, but there has got to be
something
that can be done to stop problems like this.

Got news for you. As long as boys and girls serve together,
there's going to be hanky-panky going on. Some of said
hanky-panky will involve cases where one or both (or more?)
of the players are married. To other people. Anyone who tries
to stop it will just look like an idiot. You could make it a
capital offense and it would still happen, even if you were
dealing with servicemembers who are not in a life-threatening
environment.

This is a fact of life in our society, it happens in every workplace
today and every day.

And publishing the names of the allegedly involved parties
is scurrilous.



Jeff

Not to mention that many of us would see our name and if it was done
in error would bring slande law suits that would rake in millions.

Or maybe go to the printer and kick their ass.



--
Life is routine punctuated by orgies.

How about this old Air Force saying:
"what goes TDY (temporary duty) stays TDY"
means nobody is to snitch. What do the other branches say?


"Jeff Crowell" wrote in message
...
Sunny wrote:
We have to do something about
this. I can't accept that it will never get fixed. What I don't know
is
what to do. Do we send this story to our military leaders in the hopes
that
they will "fix it"? I've seen another version of this story (see my
earler
post) and I'm sure there are more like it, so maybe the "word" is out?
I'm all for males and females in the Army, but there has got to be
something
that can be done to stop problems like this.

Got news for you. As long as boys and girls serve together,
there's going to be hanky-panky going on. Some of said
hanky-panky will involve cases where one or both (or more?)
of the players are married. To other people. Anyone who tries
to stop it will just look like an idiot. You could make it a
capital offense and it would still happen, even if you were
dealing with servicemembers who are not in a life-threatening
environment.

This is a fact of life in our society, it happens in every workplace
today and every day.

And publishing the names of the allegedly involved parties
is scurrilous.



Jeff






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----