How difficult, Jeb Corliss wing suit stunt?

Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:

John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I know
that gliding limits your ability to control altitude. This is
extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...VRJowk#t=80 s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was.
Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy his
shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I might agree
with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But he knows what the
risks are. Our special forces take risks like that, perhaps for a
better purpose but not as much fun.

Our special forces take risks like that, perhaps for a better
purpose

No disrespect intended, it just depends on the politic in charge.

On 2/10/2012 9:12 PM, John Doe wrote:
Our special forces take risks like that, perhaps for a better
purpose

No disrespect intended, it just depends on the politic in charge.

Wrong, As dangerous as a Specops mission is, they are well
thought out and executed and normally are highly successful.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs. They know their job and do it
probably beyond human capability but chance takers they aren't.
When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere
along the way and their people die in the process. When it looks
almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning
and execution of the mission. Almost all missions have been
successful.

--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

Daryl dhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Our special forces take risks like that

Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics.

--






When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere
along the way and their people die in the process. When it looks
almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning
and execution of the mission. Almost all missions have been
successful.

On 2/11/2012 8:29 AM, John Doe wrote:
Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Our special forces take risks like that

Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics.


Exactly what are your Military Credentials? Most of us in here
have them or have been connected to the Military in some way in
the past who generally comment on the procedures. What are your
creds?

Mine is 20 years in USAF and I have worked along with SFs in my
time and can tell you that they are not risk takers. They just
know their jobs so well that it may appear that way to someone
less informed.



--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

Daryl dhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:
John Doe wrote:

Our special forces take risks like that

Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing
semantics.


Exactly what are your Military Credentials?

Not much.

Mine is 20 years in USAF

Given your lack of honesty in my usual respect for the military
and veterans, that claim is depressing.

and I have worked along with SFs in my time and can tell you
that they are not risk takers.

Ever hear of a "calculated risk"?

You just want to do a semantical circle jerk, as evidenced by your
contradictory and fanciful statements. I'd rather stick to the
subject.

--

















--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.



Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news.glorb.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daryl dhunt nospami70west3.com
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.soaring,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.avi ation.military
Subject: How difficult, Jeb Corliss wing suit stunt?
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:30:23 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: jh6537$rnr$1 dont-email.me
References: 4f348ddf$0$28809$c3e8da3$f48d872 news.astraweb.com 39e02738-8040-4786-8f6c-1967b3f7ad7d dp8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com MPG.29a0954b3c65d70a9898d3 news.eternal-september.org 4f35ea26$0$31221$c3e8da3$b280bf18 news.astraweb.com 4f35eac3$0$31221$c3e8da3$b280bf18 news.astraweb.com jh55n3$vog$1 dont-email.me 4f368956$0$23399$c3e8da3$f017e9df news.astraweb.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Gf8ehz9B5xRnWK3lyvb2MQ"; logging-data="28411"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+K6CfF6SezGXG/6I9s994S6V3RHw4Id2A="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
In-Reply-To: 4f368956$0$23399$c3e8da3$f017e9df news.astraweb.com
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qgQx6q3PjjDfFP5YTAsq7Uwb230=

On 2/11/2012 11:14 AM, John Doe wrote:
Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:
John Doe wrote:

Our special forces take risks like that

Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing
semantics.


Exactly what are your Military Credentials?

Not much.

Mine is 20 years in USAF

Given your lack of honesty in my usual respect for the military
and veterans, that claim is depressing.

And you are evading the question. What are YOUR credentials?



and I have worked along with SFs in my time and can tell you
that they are not risk takers.

Ever hear of a "calculated risk"?

You just want to do a semantical circle jerk, as evidenced by your
contradictory and fanciful statements. I'd rather stick to the
subject.

Mine are dead on and someone like you with Zero experience around
these folks will never understand. So be it.





--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

On Feb 11, 8:29*am, John Doe wrote:
Daryl dhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Our special forces take risks like that
Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics.

--







When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere
along the way and their people die in the process. *When it looks
almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning
and execution of the mission. *Almost all missions have been
successful.

Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to
challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question.
Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it.

On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote:
On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John wrote:
Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Our special forces take risks like that
Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics.

--







When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere
along the way and their people die in the process. When it looks
almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning
and execution of the mission. Almost all missions have been
successful.

Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to
challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question.
Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it.

I didn't ask the original question. And as for going away, are
you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench
it to force me to go away?



--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

On Mar 24, 10:59*pm, Daryl wrote:
On 3/24/2012 11:16 PM, glidergeek wrote:









On Feb 11, 8:29 am, John *wrote:
Daryldhunt nospami70west3.com *wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Our special forces take risks like that
Wrong,

Bull****.

As dangerous as a Specops mission is,

You just contradicted yourself.

they are well thought out and executed and normally are highly
successful.

Well thought out and risky = difficult.

SF is rarely a bunch of hotdogs.

You mean like on TV? Of course not. Then again, Jeb Corliss
doesn't use a stuntman or props.

They know their job and do it probably beyond human capability

Are you in a movie?

but chance takers they aren't.

You are playing semantics. I'm not interested in playing semantics.

--

When it appears that it's impossible means they failed somewhere
along the way and their people die in the process. *When it looks
almost supernatural in the success, it's from superior planning
and execution of the mission. *Almost all missions have been
successful.

Then you should go away instead of coming here if your objective is to
challenge people if you don't get satisfaction to your question.
Likewise if you don't like the answer to your question don't ask it.

I didn't ask the original question. *And as for going away, are
you going to grab my left wrist that I am typing with and wrench
it to force me to go away?

--http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. *Tons of Military shows and
programs.

Sorry Daryl I didn't mean you I meant the original poster. He came
onto a usernet hiding behind a false name and a keyboard asked a
controversial question with the intent of starting **** and and
succeeded well. Lookit he sucked in at least 70 responses. He's
smiling thinking what a bunch of looser gliderpilots.