![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vince, the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary thinks there is...
Interesting, Gord. My M-W College Edition (hard copy) does not. Of course, "ordinary" dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. They report what people say and write, not what they should say and write; and different editors have different standards of how often a misuse must appear before it goes into the dictionary. "Thusly" does appear with some frequency. "Usage dictionaries"and "writers' guides" report what recognized authorities agree are correct and incorrect usages. Most authorities seem to consider "thusly" poor usage. For example, the _Prentice Hall Reference Guide to Grammar and Usage_ (1991) says, on p. 327, "Thusly: This is an incorrect substitute for thus." Bergen and Cornelia Evans say, in _A Dictionary of Modern American Usage_, p. 512, "Thusly seems to have originated in the Boston _Journal_ in1889. Whether it was the product of illiteracy or exuberance is not known, but it is hard to see what purpose it serves." Wilson Follet's discussion of the problem of adding "ly" to irregular adverbs runs from page 306 to 308 in _Modern American Usage_. In essence, he says that people "feel" that an adverb must end in "ly" and thus (!) add those letters where they do not belong. (Although we do not very often encounter the phrase "run fastly," despite that fact that some people "run slowly.") The _American Heritage_ online says: ADVERB: Usage Problem Thus. USAGE NOTE: Thusly was introduced in the 19th century as an alternative to thus in sentences such as Hold it thus or He put it thus. It appears to have first been used by humorists, who may have been echoing the speech of poorly educated people straining to sound stylish. The word has subsequently gained some currency in educated usage, but it is still often regarded as incorrect. A large majority of the Usage Panel found it unacceptable in an earlier survey. In formal writing thus can still be used as in the examples above; in other styles this way, like this, and other such expressions are more natural. Hope you'll forgive the long-winded response. vince norris |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|