![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK this is from memory... and the sources are not strictly 'official'. I had heard some rumours that the F-35 and F-22 AESA antennae will be merged because the MMIC's from the F-35 will be retrofitted to the F-22's ( they are very expensive and larger.) The number of MMIC's may also be the same in both aircraft to make a common 'cheap' AESA antennae (1200 IIRC). The whole avionics suite of the F-22 is now obsolete, and will cost another $3.5 Billion to 'upgrade' thats the cut from the $11.7 Billion thats been bandied about. Do you have anything to support that contention? There is a bit of a difference between wanting to improve the computers during the spiral development process and claiming that the "whole avionics suite is *obsolete*", isn't there? Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet They have to go with a more COTS based system (similar to, if not the same as the JSF), which they are working on now, for fielding in (very optomisticlly) in 2007. A simple analogy for you, the old 486 computer still works, but when I wanted to run XP on it the demands of the system increased to the point where it was useless to try, and you couldn't buy a 486 processor anywhere to support it. I call that an 'obsolete system', it worked great running win 98. Now the Raptor can't run the software to do its air to ground mission for the same reasons what would you call it?. "processor challenged???" Out of curiousity, why do you have this visceral hatred of the F/A-22? Does it perhaps stem from the fact that you know your own nation can never afford it, or what? I don't hate it, I just think its not worth the money, if it had been half the price and worked as advertised I would be impressed. As it is the price is $150M and development is not mature, production has started, How would you describe the F-22 process?. Its not a model that every industry is adopting is it. I do not doubt that Australia can't afford it, however its looking increasing likely that the US may join us in that. Brooks Normally a program this far into production can't be cancelled, but this program seems to be trying real hard... The JSF seems (at least so far) to be much more aware of getting development right first, then moving onto production. (and it doesn't need the F-22 SMURFS:-)) Cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|