![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Boomer" wrote in message ...
I 've noticed that many of the more modern fighters (F-16, SU-27) only reach max alt while subsonic, whereas older fighters ( F-4, MiG-21 for instance) reach max altitude around M 1.6 or more. Is there some general reason for this? Don't know where you picked up this info but it's bogus. Aircraft fly (and stall) on indicated airspeed, which correlates with air density (and thus developed lift). We are talking about level flight, right? In zoom climbs you go on up until the aircraft runs out of energy and starts falling back down. Usually it will be subsonic then but this is in no way at a sustainable altitude. In level flight at max altitude the faster you go the higher you can go. For instance M1.0 at 65000 gives an IAS of around 166 KIAS. This is way behind best L/D for fighter aircraft. M2 gives double that, about 332 KIAS. A M2 16 or 27 should be able to cruise in level flight at rather better than 65000 - barring any mechanical (engine) reason why it shouldn't be there. Walt BJ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 05:31 PM |
| Variable geometry intakes | Boomer | Military Aviation | 17 | April 12th 04 10:42 PM |
| CIA U2 over flight of Moscow | John Bailey | Military Aviation | 3 | April 9th 04 04:58 AM |
| WeserFlug P.1003 Compared to V-22 Osprey | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 29 | December 2nd 03 07:23 PM |
| Me-262, NOT Bell X-1 Broke SB First | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 140 | October 10th 03 09:02 PM |