![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ron choreographed a chorus line of high-kicking electrons to spell out:
I notice that the Air Force rules for an F-117 landing without using the drag chute require a runway of at least 10,000 feet and an arresting device at the end of this 10,000 foot runway. The minimum runway for takeoffs by rule is 8,000 foot. Even a 737 can do better than this. Why is the runway requirement so long? Because a 737 is designed for it, and has reversers...I would guess the 117 has higher landing speeds too. I'd back the landing speeds idea, but perhaps also they'd want to lessen the chances of losing the plane on a shorter runway? -- __ A L L D O N E! B Y E B Y E! (__ * _ _ _ _ __)|| | |(_)| \ "...and then, the squirrels attacked." |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "bush flying" in the suburbs? | [email protected] | Home Built | 85 | December 29th 04 12:04 AM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| World War II-era B-17 makes belly landing THE ASSOCIATED PRESS | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | May 7th 04 04:02 AM |
| VW-1 C-121J landing with unlocked nose wheel | Mel Davidow LT USNR Ret | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 06:22 AM |
| Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 05:35 PM |