![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buttman,
This guy is an amazing instructor. Apparently. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Generally speaking lift = AOA * Airspeed.
Except when accerlating or decelerating up or down (i.e Beginning or ending a climb or descent) the lift = weight of the airplane. Check out the 1st few pages of any physic book to verify this. Another way of thinking about it is that the tension on an elevator (Building elevator not an airplane elevator) cable always equals the weight of the elevator and occupants even if the elevator is moving. It changes only as the elevator accelerates or decelerates. so since the lift seldom changes the only other 2 variables are AOA and Airspeed. If you slow down you must increase the AOA to maintain lift. If you decrease the AOA you must increase airspeed to maintain lift. The Rate of Climb indicator directly show excess or Power in a climb or insufficent power (to maintain alt) in a descent. Movement of the Rate of climb needle (decreasing or increasing) shows changes in the amount of lift generated. A G Meter will directly show the amount of lift being Generated. i.e. 2G = 2x gross weight of the airplane is being generated. Hope that helps a little Brian CFIIG/ASEL |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
buttman wrote: So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? Nonsense. Don't listen to what any of these people are saying here. Lift is produced by the action of millions of tiny gnomes standing on each other's shoulders. The thing is they're not too strong so you have to keep moving because each gnome can only hold you up for a brief instant and pass you on to the next one. Larger wings allow you to spread the load out over more gnomes, thus creating more "lift." Spins happen when you move the controls the wrong way and scare the gnomes. Some people don't accept this because they can't see the gnomes, well, you can't see air particles either. Even the Ph.D. guys can't explain it, but any fool can see that planes fly. Gnomes! -cwk. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
buttman wrote:
My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. No. From the Jeppesen Sanderson "Private Pilot Manual" -- "Lift can be increased in two ways; by increasing the forward speed of the airplane or by increasing the angle of attack." And elsewhere -- "When an aircraft is in straight and level flight, .... lift equals weight ..." So, you have no more lift when you are cruising level than if you're in level slow flight. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
buttman opined
I have always been under the impression that lift is the product of airspeed and angle of attack, and that lift is the measure of upward force acting on the plane at a given time. For instance, if you are doing slow flight, your wings are producing the same amount of life that you would be if you were cruising, GIVEN that you did not lose or gain any altitude during the maneuver. My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. I overheard a ATP guy who flies King Air's say that this huge 20 ton military plane he used to fly would fly approaches at 110 knots, and I heard him say "It is able to do this because it producing so much lift", which I took as him defining lift as my instructor does. So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? Lift = Cl(AOA) * Area * V^2 -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ash Wyllie" wrote in message ... snip Lift = Cl(AOA) * Area * V^2 snip I believe this is more correctly stated as Lift = Cl(AOA and some other stuff including shape) * Area * P/2 * V^2 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
buttman wrote: My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. Uh-huh. So if you use a crane to lift up the nose of a 747 sitting on the ramp, your instructor believes it will be generating the same amount of lift as it would at that AOA and 400 knots. Detach the crane and the 747 will just stay there in a nose up attitude without any visible means of support. Or maybe your instructor has a poor understanding of lift. Lift is actually a mathematical formula: L = 1/2 air density * velocity squared * area of the wing * coefficient of lift for that wing. Your instructor should know that; it is on both the commercial and flight instructor written exams. You generally can't do much about the air density, but you usually can change your velocity and the coefficient of lift. The coefficient of lift for most wings increases with AOA, peaking at the critical AOA and dropping off sharply at higher AOA after that. Some flaps and other devices (variable geometry wngs come to mind) can change the area of the wing and/or its coefficient of lift. Also, "the area of the wing" is not quite right; it really is a reference area which might have little to do with the actual wing size. A helicopter, for example, uses a reference area equal to the entire disk, not just the blades. The same rule applies to propellers. The reference area on a fixed wing plane includes the area through the fuselage, as if the wing was all one piece. You can use either sq. feet or sq. meters (or, heck, sq. rods if you want to) for the reference area; it all works out as long as you use the same type of units all through the calculation, including air density. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/airflylvl3.htm
Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI buttman wrote: I have always been under the impression that lift is the product of airspeed and angle of attack, and that lift is the measure of upward force acting on the plane at a given time. For instance, if you are doing slow flight, your wings are producing the same amount of life that you would be if you were cruising, GIVEN that you did not lose or gain any altitude during the maneuver. My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. I overheard a ATP guy who flies King Air's say that this huge 20 ton military plane he used to fly would fly approaches at 110 knots, and I heard him say "It is able to do this because it producing so much lift", which I took as him defining lift as my instructor does. So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 08:50 PM |
| Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 05:08 PM |
| New theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Piloting | 70 | October 10th 04 11:50 PM |
| Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 11:55 PM |
| Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 09:52 PM |