![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 08:23:43 -0800, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Dave Nadler wrote on 11/19/2020 6:59 AM: On 11/19/2020 8:35 AM, Eric Greenwell wrote: How odd the 63:1 only occurs at the high wing loading in 21M, and not at the minimum wing loading, where the L/D is essentially the same for the 18M and 21M wings. Not odd at all. Reynolds number changes make a big difference especially with tiny chord. IIRC the original Ventus 15m increased LD 2 points with ballast, and could not change wingloading as much as modern gliders. This does not seem to be about wing loading, as the chart shows the 18/21 versions at the same wing loading, so I repeat: It's still odd that adding 10' to the span does not significantly change the performance at any speed except in the lowest few knots of the polar. If it's Reynolds number that's important: Shouldn't the 21 M wing have more feet of wider chord than the 18M wing, and shouldn't we expect it to do better, just based on that? Aspect ratio is also beneficial and will increase the overall L/D ratio at a given airspeed if the wing section and wing loading are unchanged. -- -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASW 20C Motorglider | Nick Kennedy[_3_] | Soaring | 3 | February 7th 19 11:17 AM |
FS: DG-400 Motorglider | 2G | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 13 02:32 PM |
IFR in motorglider? | cp | Soaring | 28 | March 9th 08 12:02 AM |
Motorglider Tug | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 21 | November 13th 04 04:06 AM |
motorglider | KsiTau | Soaring | 0 | September 4th 04 09:10 AM |