A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mode C Indication



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old May 4th 04, 07:22 PM
mikem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The least significant step that your encoder can report is
100' increments. If you are at 8350' per your correctly set
altimeter, the encoder/transponder is going to be transmitting
83 or 84. In an ideally calibrated encoder, it is adjusted
to switch at the 50' points, so while the aircraft is between
8250' and 8350', the encoder will report 83; while the aircraft
is between 8350 and 8450, it will report 84, and so on.
(Ignore all the blather about altimeter setting for a moment).

The encoder is typically an analog sensor going through an OpAmp
ampiflier, and then to an analog to digital converter. As with all
analog circuitry, it is subject to aging and drift. Over time, the
switching points can drift relative to the absolute altitude. The fix
is to adjust gain and zero pots in the encoder so that it tracks the
absolute altitude. At the same time, you also want your altimeter
to also track the absolute altitude. There is no provision for
"setting" the encoder to prevailing atmospheric pressure...

Because of the low resolution of the encoder, and potential discreptancy
of the encoder, the FAA treats what your encoder is reporting with a
grain of salt. They always ask "say altitude" so that they can
establish if your encoder is lying or not. They understand the
limitations of the system, so if you say 5700', and they look at the
scope and see 56, 57, or 58, they will be happy.

If they see 55 (or lower), or 59 (or higher), they will question if
you have your altimeter set correctly. If you confirm that you do,
then they will conclude that your encoder is outside the allowable
limits, and either tell you to stop alt sqwak, or tell you to get it
fixed.

Note that an incorrect altimeter setting, an inaccutate altimeter, or an
inaccurate encoder would all produce discreptancies. The only thing
you can do effect directly is the altimeter setting. Adjusting the
encoder can only be done during a static check. You could also fly
a hundred feet higher or lower than your assigned altitude to bias
the readings so that they agree... (a really bad idea). If your
altimeter is more than twenty years old, it needs overhaul and/or
replacement.

MikeM
Skylane '1MM
Pacer '00Z



Jeff wrote:
In everyone's observation, what is the typical difference between the
indicated altimeter reading with current pressure setting and the altitude
reported by mode c transponder. It seems mine always has a discrepancy of
100', sometimes 200' compared to what ATC shows.

Just wondering if it needs further investigation. Pitot static, altimeter
and transponder inspections are all current.

Thanks!
Jeff



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loss of Mode C and Transponder Reply mikem Owning 4 February 27th 04 05:52 PM
WTB: Mode C Transponder Chris Batcheller Aviation Marketplace 0 February 21st 04 01:31 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Mode S Transponders - Can ATC tell the difference? Doodybutch Owning 2 August 10th 03 06:21 AM
Mode S questoin JerryK Instrument Flight Rules 1 July 17th 03 09:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.