![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Richard. That's somewhat along the lines I was wondering
about. However, both of the cases you listed are for IFR flights. Makes me wonder why, if this information is more useful to the IFR pilot than the VFR pilot, is it on sectional charts when it sounds like it would be more useful on low level enroute charts (although, I'll be the first to admit that I have a sectional or WAC available when flying IFR). "Richard Kaplan" wrote in message ws.com... "Ace Pilot" wrote in message om... common use is doing T&Gs in the pattern below 700 feet AGL when the weather is marginal. Other uses? 1. The altitude where controlled airspace begins can be a factor for an IFR pilot selecting an airport at which to fly an instrument approach if he is concerned about airplanes legally flying a traffic pattern 1 foot below him when he breaks out of a cloud. 2. In areas with unusual and predictable weather patterns, i.e. a very thin marine fog layer, some pilots depart IMC in Class G airspace in anticipation of breakout out on top into VMC conditions before entering controlled airspace -- not necessarily wise but legal nonetheless. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 12:27 AM |