![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... Well, I removed the innards and (independently) reset the reference pointers to agree with the altitude hands at the correct Kollsman setting. (I'm pretty handy at tinkering with delicate instruments.) But I still don't really know what those little markers are for. If, as you have suggested, they are used to set the altimeter to the correct barometric pressure when the Kollsman window is blanked out, how does one know where to set the markers? Let's say one is in an area where the altitude-barometer combination there renders the Kollsman window useless. If one is given the barometric pressure there, one would then need a table or have to make a calculation to get the correct setting for the reference markers. Does this sound correct? Having read and re-read that article several times.... My latest take is that the correct position for them is zero zero, when the Kollsman window set at 29.92. From the article, they would appear to do nothing more than show the estimated "difference" (not the "pressure altitude" as I first surmised, but just the "difference").... the estimated difference between the *pressure* altitude of the airport in standard-atmosphere conditions, compared to the pressure altitude of the airport in the actual conditions of today. By setting them to show that *difference*, your altitude readout will now show the field elevation when you are on that field. Left of zero would be negative (pressure altitude is less than standard, i.e. actual pressure is higher than standard. Right of zero would be positive, air pressure is lower than standard. ) The article mentions to take care when setting negatives.... 900 would actually mean minus 100.... The only use of these markers would be if the station reported altimeter setting in terms of this "pressure altitude variation", as depicted in the diagram in the article. ( This seems to be something from a bygone era). You would set the appropriate difference on the markers ( in the appropriate plus or minus direction) and your altimeter would now be adjusted correctly..... Since pretty much everybody today reports the Kollsman value directly in "inches of mercury" (or Millibars in Europe), you do that directly with the Kollsman value, so the markers don't matter... you don't really care about the "difference" any more. So the only use today, would be... after setting the Kollsman window, you could check a table .... or make a mental estimate.... of what the difference should be ( about 100 feet per .10 inches of mercury away from 29.92).... Also, of course, that it is on the correct side of zero (left side (negative) if greater than 29.92, right side if less than 29.92).... and see that the markers correspond, as a double check. After moving the markers to zero zero at 29.92, then setting your correct altimeter setting, I would expect: If, like 29.82, the indicators should show about plus 100, 29.72: plus200, etc. If, like 30.02: minus 100, 30.12: minus 200 , etc. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Altimeter settings: QNH versus QFE | [email protected] | Soaring | 28 | June 6th 05 01:26 PM |
| ATC Altimeter Settings | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | April 11th 05 09:07 PM |
| Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 10:14 PM |
| Local altimeter at BFM | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 15th 04 03:01 PM |
| Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Tony | Naval Aviation | 290 | March 7th 04 08:58 PM |