![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walking out to my plane yesterday, I had the opportunity to walk
through a number of A/C to get to mine. I passed a Mooney (looked like a 201) and realized that the width of the prop blades was significant... It was much wider than my fixed pitch Sensenich, wider than the blades on the Bonanza sitting next to it. In fact, it had about the widest blades on the ramp (besides maybe a Navajo and the turbines). So my question - why? Blade width should create additional frontal drag. I would think you would want to minimize that. A 201 has 200hp, so it isn't like it needs to get several hundred HP transferred to the air. Since Mooney's sit low, does this mean prop clearance is an issue? Hence a short prop, hence a fat blade? Inquiring minds want to know. Thanks, Nathan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 07:45 PM |
New Prop on my Mooney Ovation | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 1 | July 7th 03 10:30 PM |